Saturday, March 20, 2010

National & State Organ Waiting List...as of 3/05/10


National & State Organ Waiting List as of
> 3/05/2010... <

As most of you know, I`m a Heart-Transplant 8/17/94...I also direct the Organ/Donor Awareness program, for the Masonic Grand Lodge of Tennessee, (The FreeMasons) Nashville Tennessee. Listed below are some stats, you might find interesting ? Click on link below or the title of this artice for more information. > http://www.gmwp.org/vision2013/oda <

National Waiting List :

Kidney---83,904

Liver---15,865

Pancreas---1,474

Kidney/Pancreas---2,210

Heart---3,147

Lung---1,856

Heart/Lung---71

Intestine---239

Total > 106,400

State of Tennessee Waiting List :

Kidney---1,915

Liver---208

Pancreas---14

Kidney/Pancreas---19

Heart---120

Lung---31

Heart/Lung---0

Intestine ---- 0

Total > 2,288


Vanderbilt :

Kidney---727

Liver---124

Pancreas---7

Kidney/Pancreas---7

Heart---26

Lung---18

Heart/Lung---0

Intestine---0

Total > 909

"Give The Gift of Life, Be an Organ/Tissue Donor, It`s the Masonic/Eastern Star thing to Do " !

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Allomap Testing for Heart Transplants



AlloMap testing is a noninvasive method for determining the risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in heart transplant recipients. The test translates the complex signals of the immune system’s multiple genes and pathways, specifically those associated with heart transplant ACR, into an objective, actionable score. 

AlloMap testing is a safe, convenient and proven new method to significantly improve heart transplant recipients’ satisfaction. Rather than having an invasive procedure in a heart catheterization lab, only a simple and quick blood draw is necessary. The blood sample is sent to the XDx clinical laboratory, a state-of-the-art clinical lab in Brisbane, where complex gene information is extracted and analyzed. Using the XDx proprietary algorithm, the information is translated into a single score that distinguishes rejection from quiescence, or a stable state. Read more. Allomap Protocol

Editorial : How Sweet it Is ! Biopsy`s are not very much fun. Allomap is the way ! Hoo-Ray ! This from a Heart-Transplant patient almost 16 years post ! Hey That`s ME !



Monday, March 15, 2010

Wal-Mart & The China Connection !



First Wal-Mart Union Begins in China Thanks to Gov't
By Andrew McLemore
Published: Sunday August 3, 2008
The first Wal-Mart trade union in China was formed after the company bowed to government demands for organized labor in its stores, The New York Times reported Friday. Wal-Mart's reluctance to allow unions, particularly in the United States where they remain banned from stores, has been a point of controversy for many years. But the government-controlled All-China Federation of Trade Unions fought for the right to create branches in the company's 60 outlets. Beth Keck, director of international corporate affairs for Wal-Mart, said she was aware of the reports of Chinese unions forming and said the company hopes to have a "cordial and productive relationship" with the federation.
"We know they have been interested in having a relationship with our company for some time," Keck said. "We will, of course, be looking forward to how this will evolve." Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, has operations in 15 countries, many of which have at least some employees that are union members.
The United States, Keck said, is the "clear exception." The change comes at a time when Wal-Mart is already battling the proposed Employee Free Choice Act -- which might allow unionization of Wal-Marts on this side of the ocean -- by
attempting to sway its employees from voting Democratic. While the company insists it is not telling employees how to vote, some who attended meetings with Wal-Mart human resources managers that delivered the company's anti-union line scoff at the notion. "The meeting leader said, 'I am not telling you how to vote, but if the Democrats win, this bill will pass and you won't have a vote on whether you want a union,'" a Wal-Mart customer-service supervisor from Missouri told the paper. "I am not a stupid person. They were telling me how to vote," she said. Wal-Mart has fought against unions for years and has many systems in place to prevent them from forming. As soon as Wal-Mart managers see a potential union, they are supposed to call a hotline, prompting a visit from a special team from Wal-Mart headquarters, The Los Angeles Times reported.
Former Wal-Mart manager Jon Lehman told
Frontline what he would tell employees regarding unions. "I used to stand up in front of my workers and lie to them," he said. "I used to say the talking points, that the union's a cult: 'You don't want to join a union. It's a cult. Why pay someone to speak for you? You can speak for yourself.'

Editorial : The reason for this article is > I have received notes informing me that Wal-Mart has Union stores in China. Thought I better check it out and see for myself. Ok, let me see, The Chinese Government is sponsoring these so called labor unions and Wal-Mart is ok with that ! SORRY ! These are Communist State Unions run by and for Wal-Mart and the Chinese Communist Government ! NOT UNIONS, as we know and operate in the good ole USA ! Wal-Mart does not have Unions in China !

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Health Care ~ Now or Never !

Health Care ~ Now or Never !
By Don Jones...3/14/10



Health Care, Health Care, Health Care. We have been discussing this all important item since before time almost ! We now seem so close, yet the Republicans are fighting it tooth and toenail ! Why ? Big insurance company`s, yes ! Our entire economy is and will be affected by any kind of national health care. Our manufacturer`s are leaving for foreign Country`s to avoid paying for health care for employee`s, and paying livable wages ! Yet, are politicians are not only allowing this, they are through incentive programs paid for by YOU the tax-payer. Have we all gone NUTS ? No, not really. It seems that greed is the main driver for all of these difficult and strange things happening to our middle class ! We tend to want to blame Unions. NOT SO ! It is pure unadulterated corporate greed ! The Republican party has made our free democratic trade unions a thing to be feared and loathed. How ridiculous. Who is to be blamed ? It is us. That`s correct, us ! WE vote for individuals who do not reflect our values as the middle class. The American dream may be lost soon ! We are swayed by hear say, innuendo, and just plain lie`s ! Even some of our church`s have mislead us. Our news media is no longer a news media. They talk 24 hours a day, and talk, talk, talk, is not a good idea. They speculate, they interview each other. Some cable news stations should be prosecuted for calling themselves a news station ! They are kinda like wrestling (rasslin) sometimes entertaining, but never "THE NEWS"! Our economy is in the pits ! Our manufacturing is moving to China for cheap labor and no health care ! I have heard that Big Unions are the fault. Not So ! It is Corporate greed. First of all, there are no longer Big Unions ! It seems that our politicians have sold us down the river ! Our fat cat politicians get fatter, we get poorer. If you vote for Republicans because they stand for your values, better check again. They mislead you with gun control, abortion, free trade and health care ! They say that their party is opposed to all of these things. They do this by convincing you that the Democrats want to take your guns, have abortion on demand, cripple trade and end our health care system. NOT SO ! Those of us who are the most vulnerable are listening to these lies ! Big money is buying our politicians. America`s race to the bottom continues, with the guidance and assistance of those we elect to represent us. BIG UNIONS, what a bad joke ! There are now 400 family's who are more wealthy than 155 million Americans combined. During this time of economic recession, when most middle class Americans are hurting, our very rich are getting richer ! Without a National Health Care Bill there is no recovery or America as we have known it !. Republicans = For The Very Wealthy ! Democrats = For the Working Class !

Better Wake up America ! It is almost gone. One Man`s opinion.



Saturday, March 06, 2010

Alan Simpson (R) No Friend of Seniors !



Alan Simpson Strikes at Seniors, Social Security, and Medicare

Former U.S. Sen. Alan Simpson(R) sat down with the CNBC television network last week to discuss his post as co-chair of the President’s Fiscal Commission on the national debt. Throughout the conversation, he leveled several attacks against seniors and senior advocacy organizations, accusing them of not caring “a whit about their grandchildren…not a whit.” When asked about cuts he would recommend to the President and Congress, he replied, “We are going to stick to the big three,” meaning, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. To see the interview, click on http://bit.ly/9Hwg6U. “Alan Simpson’s prior record in the Senate has proven his determination to cut Medicare and Social Security. His appointment has caused widespread alarm among seniors, veterans, and disabled Americans, who increasingly rely on these programs during the economic downturn !

Health Care Must be Fixed !



Obama Calls for Reconciliation in Order to Pass Health Care Reform Quickly...

In a health care speech by Barack Obama on Wednesday, the President called for an “up or down vote” that would leave Republicans unable to kill the bill through a filibuster. The current Democratic plan is to have the House vote to approve the already-passed Senate bill, plus fixes, then have the Senate pass these fixes through reconciliation. Under this scenario, only a simple majority in the Senate, rather than a super-majority of 60 votes, would be needed to pass health reform. The President stated that he wants action within a few weeks, echoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) call for an informal deadline of March 18. Despite Republican criticism that a decision to bar the filibuster would be “met with outrage” by the public, Democrats shot back with claims that the same rules had been used five times during George W. Bush’s administration. The Obama White House is still working to include bipartisan measures, and announced that they were exploring GOP proposals that include additional crackdowns on fraudulent medical charges and new rules for medical malpractice suits. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity to fix a health care system that is not benefiting millions of Americans, including many seniors.”!

Friday, February 19, 2010

Keep It Made In America




Keep it Made in America


Dear Don,


The Whirlpool Corp. is closing a refrigerator manufacturing plant in Evansville, Ind., putting more than 1,100 people out of work. Even worse, Whirlpool will continue to produce these refrigerators, but not in Evansville and not anywhere else in America. They are planning to manufacture them in Mexico, where weaker labor and environmental laws make them "cheaper" for Whirlpool to produce.This is outrageous and unacceptable, especially in light of Whirlpool's profitability and the $19 million dollars in economic recovery money Whirlpool recently received from the federal government as a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Those are OUR economic recovery funds, not Mexico's.To protest Whirlpool's decisions and demand good jobs in America, I'm heading to Evansville next Friday to rally and march with local workers and labor leaders--and I'd like you to join me. No, I'm not asking you to join me in person, but I Would like you to sign a petition in solidarity with the Evansville workers for me to deliver to Whirlpool's management.Click here to sign our petition to Whirlpool: Keep It Made in America: Save Our Jobs:http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/evansville/wxews8b447dmjbi6?Too many people have lost their jobs. Too many jobs have been sent overseas. Enough is enough. Whirlpool's management can't take our money, shut down our factories and lay off our workers.It's not acceptable--and together we're going to deliver a loud and clear message to Whirlpool: Keep It Made in America and Save Our Jobs. Sign our petition today:http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/evansville/wxews8b447dmjbi6 ?Tell your friends to sign the petition in solidarity :http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/evansville/forward/wxews8b447dmjbi6?Together we will fight against corporate greed and for good jobs. Together we will rebuild the American economy, because everyone deserves a good job NOW!

In solidarity,
Richard L. Trumka AFL-CIO President
P.S. Please sign the petition today:
http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/evansville/wxews8b447dmjbi6?. Our power is in our numbers. Together we can make a difference.--------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Senate Filibuster ~ What is It ?



What is a Senate Filibuster ?


A filibuster is a tactic used by the Senate's minority to delay or defeat a bill or amendment. Under Senate rules, a final up-or-down vote on a bill cannot be taken until Senators agree to end debate on it. A filibuster takes advantage of this rule to prolong debate indefinitely. The vote to end debate is known as cloture, from the French word for "ending." Although most votes in the Senate are decided by a simple majority of 51 votes, it takes three-fifths of the "duly chosen and sworn" senators to pass cloture. In practice, that usually means 60 out of 100 senators, regardless of whether they are present for the vote. The only time it would take fewer than 60 votes is if a Senate seat were vacant due to death or a disputed election, for example. In today's political climate, the threat of a filibuster usually causes the Senate majority leader to count cloture votes. If there are not 60 votes, a bill will probably not make it to the floor since that would clog up the calendar, hurting the chances of other legislation.

Editorial : And we wonder why nothing gets done in Washington D.C. ? Politics as usual !

Monday, February 08, 2010

Health Care ~ For America, NOW !


Write a Letter to your Local Newspaper


An alarming new study shows that health care costs increased last year at the fastest rate in more than a half century. Health care spending rose to an estimated $2.5 trillion in 2009, or $8,047 per person -- and is now projected to nearly double by 2019. If we don't act, this growing burden will mean more lost jobs, more families pushed into bankruptcy, and more crushing debt for our nation.The conclusion is clear: This isn't a problem we can kick down the road for another decade -- or even another year. We need to pass health reform now.We're incredibly close. But too many in Washington are now saying that we should delay or give up on reform entirely. So we need to make it crystal clear that Americans understand the stakes for our economy and our lives, and that we want action.Can you write a letter to the editor of your local paper right now?In just five minutes of your time, you can tell thousands of readers about this new report on spiraling costs, and why abandoning reform is just not an option.You can also help by posting this note on Facebook, letting your friends know about the new costs study and asking them to join you in writing a letter to a local paper. President Obama and many allies in Congress are working hard to finish the job -- but we can't rest until it's done. Your note will help break through the Washington spin and show members of Congress and the media what local voters really believe. Click here to get started:http://my.barackobama.com/FinishTheJobIt's clear that we're in the fight of our lives to pass real reform. But after a century of trying, the finish line is finally in sight. As President Obama reminded us all in his State of the Union address, we're fighting for our families and our country -- and we don't quit.Thanks for making it possible.

Friday, February 05, 2010

Republicans Scare Me ! They Want to Privatize Social Security ! God Save Us !



Republicans Scare me to Death !



Solve Deficit by Privatizing Medicare and Social Security ? Texas Republican Rep. Jeb Hensarling suggested in an interview Monday that the only way to curb the budget deficit is by cutting entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare. He said, "I'm willing to say that part of the social contract will need to be re-engineered." It was a flashback to the Bush-era where schemes to privatize Social Security and cut benefits were widely rejected by seniors and other Americans. Click here to watch the interview on the subject: http://bit.ly/b0j3iY.

Editorial : Same Old crap, cut us and give it to Wall-Street ! The one thing you can say positive about the Republicans is, they are consistent ! Take from the poor and give to the Rich ! Hey Folks, I don`t make this stuff up ! Ole Jeb Scare you ? Does ME !

President Obama Includes Stimulus Payment for Social Security Recipients...Hey Thats Me !


One Time Payment for Social Security Recipients...?

The President's Budget Includes $250 Stimulus Payment for Social Security Recipients. President Obama's Fiscal Year 2011 budget proposes a $250 payment to Social Security recipients. The relief would come at a time when Social Security beneficiaries will not be receiving a normal cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) because of a formula that forbids adjustments during times of negative inflation. "Without a COLA, far too many of America's seniors will find it even more difficult to purchase basic necessities, heat their homes and pay for their medications. "The President's budget proposal will provide Social Security beneficiaries with the equivalent of a 2% increase in benefits and will help greatly to bolster their financial security."As expected, the budget also calls for a Bipartisan Fiscal Commission that will address the growth of entitlement spending, including Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. A plan to freeze non-security discretionary spending for three years to address the budget deficit would not affect those programs. "We must watch this fiscal commission development carefully, so that the budget is not balanced on the backs of seniors," Other items in the budget are aimed at supporting seniors. These include $3.3 billion for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP); funds to reduce Social Security backlogs; and money to help families care for aging relatives at home. Retirement security initiatives include establishing automatic workplace IRAs, with employees being able to "opt-out" if they choose; doubling the credit for small employers starting a retirement plan; and providing a 50-percent match on the retirement savings of families that earn less than $85,000.

Monday, February 01, 2010

The War on Drugs ~ Lost a Long time Ago !


The War on Drugs , We`re Fighting the Right War, The Wrong Way...

By: Anonymous. I could have written this, but I did`nt !
Don Jones = Underdog

As it is, there is very little real treatment available in this country. The little treatment for addiction that insurance companies will authorize is pitiful. Those who get treatment are usually users who have committed a criminal offense...society has criminalized it's concept of addiction, and this is a sad fact. I believe we could wipe out the "drug problem" with one easy weapon...Treatment. If we treated addicts and alcoholics the way we treat cancer we would be way ahead of the game. One part of me wants to defend users of medical marijuana, but I've treated far too many "pot heads" who used this as a scam to be high most of the time. We need a total revamping of how we look at alcohol and drugs. We need to treat people with a disease. And....in some cases even the medical use of any substance would be counter indicative of a transplant. Would you transplant someone who was addicted to opioid pain killers ? On top of all of this is the fact we know insurance companies will look for any reason to not provide treatment, especially if it is an expensive one. No easy answers, lots of problems and it isn't going away any time soon. In my opinion, we lost the "War on Drugs" a long time ago...we should raise the white flag and start treating people who need treatment.
Editorial : I have been saying this for a very longtime now ! Alas, No one seems to listen ! We will never win a war on drugs, using the tactics we are at present.
Response from : Martin TN. Chief of Police
Criminalizing addiction and decriminalizing illicit drugs aren’t mutually inclusive in my opinion. I have sympathy for those who addicted to drugs commit criminal offenses to support their addiction. Like so many other arguments in our country today, facts are twisted to fit a political stance. More times than not, the criminals we deal with are criminals first and drug addicts second and that my friend is a fact based on twenty years of work in the field and hundreds of interviews and thousands of excuses. There are however, occasionally, drug addicted persons who, minus the impetus of drugs in their lives, could and probably would be productive citizens. My problem with your hypothesis is that it fails to separate the chaff from the wheat. I obviously feel very strongly about harsh penalties for drug offenses but make no mistake, my focus as is that of most of my piers is not that of punishment for the addict but rather punishment for those who prey on addiction by profiting from it. That is the drug dealer. The person who makes money on the addict. This is not a war we can concede whether we are winning or not! That also includes doctors who freely dispense prescription drugs with little or no evaluation as to need or purpose. Again, a drug dealer. Just one with letters behind his or her name.

David Moore, Chief of Police
Martin Tennessee Police Department
101 University St./ P.O. Box 9
Martin, Tennessee 38237
ph. (731) 587-5355 x236
fax (731) 587-5183
dbmoore@martindps.org

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

National Organ Transplant Waiting List !

















Organ Transplant Waiting List.<>USA ~ Tennessee ~ Vanderbilt
1/26/2010



National List :

Kidney ---- 83,009

Liver---- 15,770

Pancreas---1,490

Kidney/Pancreas---2,195

Heart---3,013

Lung---1,828

Heart/Lung---76

Intestine---229

Total : 105,294



Tennessee :

Kidney---1,867

Liver---208

Pancreas---14

Kidney/Pancreas---20

Heart---117

Lung---32


Heart/Lung---0


Intestine---0


Total: 2,238



Vanderbilt :

Kidney---709


Liver---127


Pancreas---7


Kidney/Pancreas---6


Heart---27


Lung---20


Heart/Lung---0


Intestine---0


Total: 890


"Give The Gift of Life, Be an Organ/Tissue Donor, It`s the Masonic thing to Do " !

Monday, January 25, 2010

Organ/Donation ~ Just The Facts !





Organ/Donation & The Media ?

Sunday's NBC Dateline broadcast the story of the trial of the California transplant surgeon who was accused in 2008 of trying to kill a patient for their organs. It was widely reported when the charge was brought, and, as usual, totally ignored when he was found innocent. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34956452 This story is highly unusual for the media. I find that it`s the story not the facts that the media enjoys. Most, but not all Transplant movies are highly exaggerated ! It sells tickets. Get the facts from a Transplanted Patient or one of the accepted Organ/Donor Awareness groups. such as, Tennessee Donor Services. The Freemasons Grand Lodge of Tennessee. Click on the web-site above ! Click on the following for Tennessee Donor Services (TDS)> http://www.donatelifetn.org/ <
You can also contact this writer at > donjones90@gmail.com <> " Give The Gift of Life, Be an Organ/Tissue Donor, it`s the Masonic Thing to Do"! Grand Lodge of Tennessee, The Freemasons > http://www.grandlodge-tn.org/

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Health Care Stopped by Republican Minority !

Republican Minority ~ Kills Health Care Reform !
By Don Jones = Underdog

I have been watching this so called debate on Health Care, in the Congress and the Senate ! I`m at a loss ? I do not understand ! Then a light turns on ! The health care/insurance/lobby money is buying votes and influence. Now, the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations are unfettered to spend all the money they wish, to buy up their/congressional votes ! It seems that the American middle class is doomed. I have been an optimist most of my life. I am no longer an optimist. I have been told that, Unions can now do the same thing. That`s true. However, compared to corporations, unions are mere paupers. In other words, Union money compared to corporate money is like a drop of water in the ocean. Corporations can buy and sell us and anyone else to get their laws passed, and they will ! When George W. Bush had an opportunity to pack the court with two new Justices, he did ! Both Republican ! The Court is now (5) conservative and (4) progressive. Guess what ? American middle class loses again. The Republican minority is still running the country. Not by the majority votes they once had, but by the minority votes they now have. I would not have thought this possible, I was wrong ! They just say no to any of President Obama`s plans to reform, not only health care, but anything he try`s to accomplish. Senator Mitch McConnell (R) Kentucky is the minority leader. He has kept his troops in lock step to oppose anything the Democrats offer ! McConnell could care less about the middle class ! I know this, if health care reform is not accomplished. The things that are so desperately wrong with this country will not get any better. As I see it,(1.) Health Care, (2.)Trade, (3.)Wall-Street and (4.) Manufacturing are the most important items to be reformed. What can be done ? President Obama must begin by going to the American people and telling them, like it is. He must become President Franklin D. Roosevelt and tell the lobbyist and the Republicans things they have not heard before ! America can only survive by his strength. President Obama is a great orator. Action and deeds are needed to back up the oration !

Supreme Court Rules Against America`s Middle Class !

Supreme Court Packed by "Dubya" Rules Against Middle Class Americans...

Yesterday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporations can spend freely in federal elections.It's a green light for a new stampede of special interest money in our politics, giving their lobbyists even more power in Washington. Now, every candidate who fights for change could face limitless attacks from corporate special interests like health insurance companies and Wall Street banks.While the GOP is celebrating a victory for its special interest allies, President Obama is working with leaders in Congress to craft a forceful response that protects the voices of ordinary citizens. Please add your name right away to help show that the American people support strong, urgent action to prevent a corporate takeover of our democracy. Congress: I support bold action to ensure fair elections. The Supreme Court decision overturned a 20-year precedent saying that corporations could not pay for campaign ads from their general treasuries. And it struck down a law saying corporations couldn't buy "issue ads" -- which only thinly veil support for or opposition to specific candidates -- in the closing days of campaigns.The result? Corporations can unleash multi-million-dollar ad barrages against candidates who try to curb special interest power, or devote millions to propping up elected officials who back their schemes.With no limits on their spending, big oil, Wall Street banks, and health insurance companies will try to drown out the voices of everyday Americans -- and Republicans seem ecstatic.While opponents of change in Congress are praising this victory for special interests, President Obama has tasked his administration and Congress with identifying a fix to preserve our democracy -- and we need to show that the American people stand with him.Add your name today:http://my.barackobama.com/FairElections

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Health Care Reform & The Public Option = Definition


The Public Option & Health Care Reform
Definition !
By Sarah Rubenstein
April, 2010


So what is this “public” insurance plan that President Obama has been talking about, anyway ? When Obama was on the campaign trail, he pushed the idea of giving consumers the chance to choose among both private and publicly sponsored health-insurance options. The idea has caused some consternation among insurers, who worry such a public plan would have an unfair advantage with the heft of the government behind it. Another question is whether the new public plan would pay doctors at the same rates that Medicare does — rates many doctors feel are too low. In a media briefing hosted by the Kaiser Family Foundation today, Nancy-Ann DeParle, who’s running the new White House Office of Health Reform, was asked for her own definition of the term. Her response:
A public plan is something that’s sponsored by the government, and therefore has very low or almost nonexistent administrative costs, compared to others. It doesn’t have the need to have brokers out selling; it wouldn’t have the need to have a lot of costs and profits, the way private plans would. So it has that advantage. It could operate by the same rules that all the other plans do; it could have payments rates that are very similar. Or it could have payment rates that are the same as Medicare — that’s one idea that’s been used. So there are various ways of looking at it. DeParle then said one model might be the plans that are offered to state employees. They’re government-sponsored and tend to be less expensive, but they’re often operated by private companies, she said.
Another model is Medicare, she added.
When it comes to differences on how to construct such a plan or how much it would pay, “there are ways of bridging that gap,” DeParle said. Some folks on the left,
including Howard Dean, are trying to make sure Obama doesn’t give up the idea altogether.

Editorial : The Public Option, a Good Idea !

Trade, Trade, Trade ~ China, China, China ! U.S. Workers Shafted Again !



President Leo W. Gerard, United Steelworkers International:
January 11, 2010 10:33 AM

A screwy thing happened after the United Steelworkers and eight domestic steel producers won their trade case late in December against Chinese manufacturers of the steel pipe used for oil and gas drilling. Instead of describing it as an important victory for U.S. industry and workers, one in which they proved to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that China violated international trade rules, the media characterized it as Americans unnecessarily picking a fight with the Chinese. What else is new ? It's exactly what happened in September when the United Steelworkers won tariffs in a trade case regarding imported Chinese tires. What's particularly disturbing about this stance from the media is that it occurs only when a trade case involves manufactured goods. The media strongly supports protections for copyrighted material - movies, music etc. The media have made clear they oppose Chinese piracy of intellectual property - you know, like the written and filmed products that media members produce.
But their reaction is completely different when the Chinese violate international rules regarding manufactured goods. Then, the media blame the victims -- the U.S. industries and workers - the same way defense attorneys accuse rape victims.
Here, for example, is the
Washington Post contending that the ITC decision to impose duties of between 10.4 and 15.8 percent on Chinese pipe heightened trade hostilities between the U.S. and China:"The current tensions began in September, when the United States imposed a staggering 35 percent import fee on tires from China." The Dow Jones Newswire in a story by Henry J. Pulizzi also charged the U.S. with provoking the Chinese by imposing duties, beginning with a reference to the steel pipe decision:"The ruling adds more tension to the U.S.-China trade relationship. Ties between Washington and Beijing are already frayed by the Obama administration's imposition of duties on Chinese tire imports and China's criticism of U.S. moves as protectionist."These reporters act like the decisions themselves initiated animosity between the U.S. and China over trade. That completely disregards how the process starts - with China violating international trade rules it had agreed to obey in ways that cause U.S. businesses to collapse, factories to close, thousands of U.S. paper workers, tire workers, steelworkers and others to lose their jobs, and their communities to suffer. We could sit back and just take it and allow U.S. industries to die, one after another, while China keeps its citizens employed by providing subsidies and supports forbidden under international law to its industries and then selling the goods in the U.S. at prices below production costs. But that doesn't sit well with most Americans. They believe their country should enforce trade rules. That is what U.S. industry and unions are demanding. That is what occurred in the tire and steel cases. That is what the United Steelworkers and paper manufacturers are seeking in a trade case to be heard later this year. Demanding adherence to the rules isn't protectionism. And the media need to stop saying it is. Here's how Dan DiMicco, chief executive officer of Nucor, the nation's second largest steelmaker, explained it, "It is not protectionism when countries are held accountable for the agreements and obligations they freely entered into to have access to the USA and world's markets." In addition to falsely making this a protectionist fight, the media wrongly contend the tariffs were political. Dow Jones, for example, tried to make the unanimous ITC decision in the steel case political, writing: "The ITC is an independent federal agency tasked with investigating the impact of alleged 'dumping' of foreign products on U.S. industries. While its six commissioners are split evenly between Republicans and Democrats, the decision fits with the Obama administration's push to address U.S. manufacturers' concerns about Chinese competition." Dow Jones implies here that somehow Obama managed to strong-arm all three Republican ITC members to vote his way in this case. None of the stories suggesting politics were involved in the tariff decisions note that Republican Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama and nine Republican Congressmen joined dozens of Democrats in signing letters to the ITC supporting the duties.
Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman
has written that failure to enforce trade laws and compel China to stop manipulating its currency could cost the U.S. 1.4 million jobs over the next couple of years. He describes China's behavior as mercantilist - supporting industry for export of goods to maintain high employment and trade surpluses. He quoted economist Paul Samuelson:"With employment less than full. . . all the debunked mercantilist arguments" - that is, claims that nations who subsidize their exports effectively steal jobs from other countries - "turn out to be valid."That is what China is doing to the U.S. - stealing jobs. The U.S. doesn't have to let it happen. America can enforce international trade laws. It works. Shortly after President Obama imposed the tire tariffs, Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. announced plans to add capacity to its Findlay, Ohio plant and hire up to 100 workers. Other U.S. tire plants began recalling laid off workers. American manufacturers, workers and communities are the victims of unfairly traded Chinese exports. They're fed up with the media blaming them when all they're asking for is justice.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-w-gerard/in-trade-too-often-the-vi_b_418424.html?view=print

Monday, January 11, 2010

Organ/Donation & Your (PCP)Primary Care Physician


Primary Care Physicians & Organ Donation ?

By Charles Bankhead, Staff Writer, MedPage TodayPublished: January 08, 2010Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco andDorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM, CDE, Nurse Planner
Earn CME/CE creditfor reading medical news

Explain to patients that a survey of primary care physicians showed that physicians rarely discuss organ donation with their patients. Primary care physicians rarely discuss organ donation with patients, even though most of the doctors believe organ donation is within the scope of their practice, a survey of primary care physicians showed. Fewer than 4% of physicians said they discussed organ donation with patients, compared with 30% who discussed end-of-life issues. Almost two-thirds of the physicians said organ donation is not outside the scope of clinical practice. Most often, discussions about organ donation occur with grieving individuals who are trying to cope with a friend or family member's imminent death, or during applications for drivers' licenses and renewals.The survey findings suggest a need for increased involvement of healthcare workers, and more specifically, primary care physicians, according to authors of an article in the January issue of the Journal of the National Medical Association. "With more than 100,000 Americans waiting for organ transplants, it is crucial that we find new ways to increase donation," J. Daryl Thornton, MD, of MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, said in a statement. "New efforts should focus on improving communication on the subject between healthcare providers and their patients."Discussion of organ donation with a primary care provider might increase patients' willingness to donate, Thornton and co-authors wrote. However, the frequency of such conversations had not been reported. To examine the issue, the authors conducted a mail and Internet-based survey of a national sample of 831 primary care physicians, with oversampling of African- American and Hispanic physicians. Respondents comprised 233 non-Hispanic blacks, 194 Hispanics, and 277 non-Hispanic whites. The 41-item questionnaire elicited information about respondents' demographics and practice patterns, professional knowledge about organ donation, and personal experience with organ donation, including their own willingness to be organ donors (live or deceased). White physicians tended to be older than blacks and Hispanics (47.3 years versus 43.6 and 44.8). More than half of the black physicians were women, compared with a quarter of Hispanics and a third of whites. About 60% of whites were family physicians, whereas 55% of blacks and 57% of Hispanics were internists. Overall, 97% of respondents expressed support for organ donation, with relatively small proportions saying they would be unwilling to donate their own organs (7% of whites, 11% of Hispanics, 17% of blacks). Responses showed that 47% of blacks had signed a donor card, compared with 61% of Hispanics and 79% of whites. Overall, 4% of physicians said they had discussed organ donation with more than half of their patients. The authors found that 5% of physicians had donor cards in their offices, while 11% had information about organ donation, and 50% could cite sources of information for patients. In contrast, 29% of black physicians, 36% of Hispanics, and 23% of whites had discussed end-of-life issues with patients (P=0.01, Hispanics versus other two groups). Responses showed that 16% of physicians received training in organ donation during medical school and 17% afterward. However, 71% had provided care for a transplant recipient. Most respondents felt they had inadequate knowledge about organ donation, but only 36% thought that discussion of organ donation was outside the scope of their practice. A multivariate analysis revealed only two significant predictors of organ donation discussions: donation education during or after medical school (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.00 to 6.5, P<0.05)>

Thursday, December 10, 2009

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs ~ Manufacturing Base !


Reminder: Last Day !


On Monday, Rapid Response sent out an important survey to get your input on how to create jobs in our country. If you haven’t yet done the survey, take five minutes to do so TODAY! The President is considering various approaches for needed job creation, including the strategies the USW is fighting for. He is now asking us to weigh in to tell him what we believe should be the most important priorities and tactics to make this happen. Responses will be compiled on Friday, so we need everyone who has not taken the survey to do so right now !

Or you can click on the title of this artice !

Wednesday, December 09, 2009

The Gift of Life ~ How Inspiring...


Yes, it is so great that we are all still here to enjoy and Celebrate life this Holiday Season.

By James Gleason

My wife just came back from a transplant nurses meeting (about 80 attending) and shared that my own 15 years (and I note and celebrate those others who responded to Adam with heart transplant years of 15 and 27 years out - YES!!!) is remarkable given what she heard in that presentation. Their topic was "Optimizing Immunosuppressive Management Strategies in the Transplant Patient and in retrospect they are still learning so much about our long history of over dosing/underdosing that it is truly amazing that we have the very positive results we have, and it should be getting better with each passing year as they learn more from observing those of us who are the long term survivors (hearts I'm talking about here, since the kidneys certainly have the longer history of those many years survival). I have observed over these years that transplant doesn't' prevent death, its an extension of the uncertain life span we all must face, transplant or not. So I have decided that the real question we all face is not how long we are going to live, but rather, what are we going to do with the life we have today, and tomorrow and if gifted with yet more, those days too.
So given this wonderful network we share here, what is everyone doing these days with that gift of life? Any special things you can share from this past year, for example, that were really special because you had that year to live because of the gift from a donor family who faced the other side of this uncertain length of life years/days? What are you celebrating this holiday season and how are you going to celebrate it because you can with this transplant ? Yes, Adam, we are (most of us anyway) still here, and thankfully very busy living life. Thanks for asking so we could share in responding to you this way. Happy and healthy holidays everyone (i.e., Russ, Karen, etc.). "Live long and prosper..." as they said on that famous Star Trek show years ago.

Jim Gleason,
Heart Transplant Recipient,
Oct 19th, 1994...

Editorial : I wish, I had written this. "Thanks Jim" !
Don Jones
Heart Transplant Recipient
Aug 17th, 1994