Underdog

Monday, November 29, 2010

Millionaires Say : Don`t Extend Tax Cuts for U$ !

These Millionaire$ Say: Don’t Extend Tax Cuts for U$
by Tula Connell, Nov 23, 2010

http://www.fiscalstrength.com/

Looks like some bazillionaire$ are joining Warren Buffet in urging that Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest expire at the end of the year. Calling themselves “Patriotic Millionaire$ for Fiscal Strength,” more than 40 of the nation’s wealthiest individuals wrote an open letter to President Obama urging him to “allow tax cuts on incomes over $1 million to expire at the end of this year as scheduled.” We have done very well over the last several years. Now, during our nation’s moment of need, we are eager to do our fair share. We don’t need more tax cuts, and we understand that cutting our taxes will increase the deficit and the debt burden carried by other taxpayers. The country needs to meet its financial obligations in a just and responsible way. The U.S. public agrees. A new survey out today shows 51 percent of registered voters want Congress to extend the tax cuts only for households making less than $250,000 a year. As Joe Conason reminds us, the Patriotic Millionaire$ campaign came out the same day as a new study showing that half of the members of the House and the Senate are millionaire$—and many of those millionaire$ want our tax money to go to their tax breaks. And some of these congressional millionaires also say we can’t afford to maintain unemployment insurance for long-term jobless workers in the worst economic morass since the Depression. The Patriotic Millionaire$ site notes that ”letting tax cuts for the top 2 percent expire as scheduled would pay down the debt by $700 billion over the next 10 years.” That’s real money—money the nation’s more than 16 million jobless workers certainly don’t have to hand over to the 375,000 people who make more than $1 million a year. The site notes that in 1963—when prosperity in the United States was far more widespread—millionaire$ had a top marginal tax rate of 91 percent. Today, millionaires have a top marginal tax rate of 35 percent. The millionaires who signed on this letter are indeed patriotic—and others in that income bracket should show their red, white and blue colors as well.

Editorial : Aw Com`on Millionaire$, we commoners pay more Tax`$ than you do !Warren Buffet and his Patriotic Millionaire$ are to be commended for their stand on this issue. it is our Elected Millionaire$ that seem to think, they are privileged ! Our Congressman and Senators do not want to share our burden with us ! To view the letter, click on title or link provided above. View Warren Buffets Comments her > http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/349411/watch%3A_warren_buffett_talks_sense_about_raising_taxes_on_the_rich/ <


















Thursday, November 25, 2010

Congressman Tom DeLay(R) Texas~Guilty




DeLay Convicted on Money Laundering and Conspiracy charges
By Bridget Johnson - 11/24/10
Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) was found guilty Wednesday on money laundering and conspiracy charges. DeLay was indicted in 2005 on charges of conspiracy to violate election laws by illegally funneling $190,000 in corporate money to candidates in 2002. He subsequently stepped down as majority leader. DeLay, who blasted the indictments as "political retribution," now faces up to life in prison on the conviction. Sentencing is set for Dec. 20. Jurors in the Travis County, Texas, court deliberated for 19 hours before returning the guilty verdicts in the three-week trial, according to wire reports. "This is an abuse of power. It's a miscarriage of justice, and I still maintain that I am innocent. The criminalization of politics undermines our very system and I'm very disappointed in the outcome," DeLay told reporters outside the courtroom, according to the Associated Press. DeLay's attorney said the former No. 2 House lawmaker will appeal.

Editorial : Congressman DeLay was found guilty by a jury of his peers. Sounds like the Congressman needs a reality check. Abuse of Power, Sounds like ole Tom is correct about abuse of Power...HIS ! As far as spending life or anytime in prison...Don`t hold your breath. The only miscarriage of justice, was his election.
Criminalization of politics ? Ole Tom, did that early on. I just hope, we (taxpayers) are not paying for his defense ? After all, he just wanted to serve...ROFLMAON

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Cohen on Fox News



American Middle Class have a friend in Memphis ~ Steve Cohen ! http://cohen.congressnewsletter.net/mail/util.cfm?gpiv=2100066191.6779.100&gen=1

Cohen on Hardball with Chris Matthews



Rep. Steve Cohen (D) Tennessee 9th. District - Memphis !
http://cohen.congressnewsletter.net/mail/util.cfm?gpiv=2100066191.6779.100&gen=1

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

White House White Board: Your Healthcare Dollar



It` Your Money ! Why not ? White House Health Care Reform web-site >

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension ~ Maybe Thats Me ?



Eye on Health: Lung Disease...PAH
Posted: Nov 18, 2010
By Latrice Curry , Eye on Health Reporter
Everyday activities that most of us take for granted, are extremely difficult for some people. Making it through a normal days work became almost impossible for Christine Wilkinson. "As a nurse when I couldn't do my 12 hours on the floor between patients without having to sit down all the time," says Wilkinson. After several frustrating visits to various doctors, Wilkinson was finally diagnosed with a rare lung disease, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension also known as P-A-H. "In the nutshell it is high blood pressure in your lungs," says Dr. Mike Czarnecki. Dr. Czarnecki is known as the "Lung Doctor" and he says this condition is often mis-diagnosed as other common ailments such as COPD. "This is a rare disease and often goes mis-diagnosed because the symptoms are dizziness, shortness of breath, maybe you are unable to walk to your mailbox without getting short of breath," says Dr. Mike Czarnecki. There are four categories of P-A-H, Classes 1 through 4 with four being the most serious, where patients show symptoms with any type of activity, sometimes even while resting. While Dr. Czarnecki says most cases aren't caught in the early stages, Wilkinson's was. "I am more aware of it, the heart pain, but I am feeling better because not also having the asthma slow me down as well," says Wilkinson. Correct diagnosis and treatment is crucial. Dr. Mike Czarnecki says "Without treatment it is a lethal disease." P-A-H is more common by a 3-1 margin in women, with most of them being diagnosed in their 30's and 40's. Treatment can range from oral medications to inhaled therapies and IV therapies. Dr. Czarnecki says if you ever took the diet drug phen phen, you might be at risk, because it was taken off the market because it caused Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Editorial : This writer has PAH, We/Vandy think`s ? Sometimes walking can be a nightmare. Taking a shower is a nightmare. Dressing is tough. It affects you, as if you are running a race, and cannot catch your breath ! (It is shortness of Breath) I am a Male ! My medications are (revatio 20mg. tabs) 3 times a day & (tyvaso inhalation liquid therapy) 4 times a day. I`m not sure, that it is helping ? And wow is it expensive. $$$$$...You don`t want to know. If you see me out, you would think, I was fine, but, I`m at rest. When I get up to walk after a longtime idle, it is a nightmare. Oh, did I mention, I`m a Heart-Transplant 16 years post !
I do have a Female Heart ! I have never taken phen phen. Top left is my PAH Physician, Dr. Anna Hemnes, Vanderbilt University. She`s a Dandy !

Republicans Fight Healthcare...BUT, They want Theirs !

CONGRESSMAN ELECT ANDY HARRIS ~ Does`nt Want you to have Healthcare ! BUT...HE WANTS HIS !

The repeal-monger hypocrisy continues. On the campaign trail, Congressman-elect Andy Harris railed against "government take-over" of health care and then the very first thing he did upon coming to Capitol Hill for freshman orientation was to ask for his. And when Harris was told he had to wait for his tax payer-sponsored health care, he did what you'd expect all conservative Republicans who ran against health care to do: He got cranky !
Click here > http://healthcareforamericanow.org/page/s/hypocrisy < The repeal-mongers want to let insurance companies deny people coverage due to pre-existing conditions and drop people when they get sick. They want to get rid of the small-business tax credit and repeal measures to cut down waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare. Sign the petition now and stand up to phony lawmakers who line their pockets while working families are left on their own against the insurance companies. If Republicans have their way, the insurance companies will get the profits and we'll get the shaft. Health Care for America Now joins with the thousands of activists already calling for an immediate end to this deplorable and selfish behavior from the Republicans who support repeal.
http://healthcareforamericanow.org/page/s/hypocrisy
Send a message that we will not stand by while the new congress does the bidding of the insurance companies.

Editorial : Remember Congressman Harris(R) is a Doctor/MD! How low can he go ? He wants to repeal your healthcare...but...he wants his (tax payer paid for) Now !Now that`s fair...Sure it is. People you got what you elected ! Just be sure you pay his Healthcare Insurance premium. I`m sure we can, because we`ll save when we get rid of yours ! HYPOCRITES ! You gotta admit, Republicans have BRASS !







Monday, November 22, 2010

Health Care ! ~ It`s All About The Money ! Insurance Money...





Health Care Giants Spent $86 Million in Effort to Kill Reform
by James Parks, Nov 19, 2010

We reported that Big Insurance funneled millions of dollars to the Chamber of Commerce to fight health care reform and millions more to try and water down the law once it was passed. Now Bloomberg Business News reporter Drew Armstrong has put a price tag on the effort to kill the bill. In an article earlier this week, Armstrong says tax records show big health insurers last year gave the Chamber $86.2 million that was used to oppose the health care overhaul law. The Chamber is not required to disclose its donors, but unnamed sources told Bloomberg that the money came from America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), an industry trade group that represents companies like Cigna and UnitedHealth Group. AHIP’s donation accounted for 40 percent of all the money the Chamber received in 2009. The money paid for advertisements, polling and grass roots events to drum up opposition to the bill that’s projected to provide coverage to 32 million uninsured Americans, a Chamber spokesman told Armstrong. But the spending hasn’t stopped. Opponents of the overhaul have spent $108 million since then to advertise against it, the New York Times recently reported—six times more than supporters have spent. Meanwhile, the big insurers continue to make outrageous profits. Six of the nation’s biggest private health insurance companies saw their profits increase by 22 percent over last year in the quarter that ended in September, according to a new analysis by Health Care for America Now (HCAN). HCAN says the $3.4 billion in 2010 third-quarter profits for WellPoint Inc., UnitedHealth Group Inc., Aetna Inc., Humana Inc., Cigna Corp. and Coventry Health Care Inc. is tied to the companies spending a “smaller share of their premiums on medical care, purging unprofitable members and burdening consumers with higher cost-sharing limits.” !

Editorial : It`s all about the money ! The Big Insurance and Drug company`s get richer and the consumer gets poorer ! President Obama pass`s laws...they learn quickly how to get around them. The Chamber of Commerce, picture at top R should read small business UNION !





Tennessee District#9- Rep. Steve Cohen, Recent Events !





Steve Cohen, Representing Middle Class Americans ~ YES !
11/22/10

http://cohen.congressnewsletter.net/mail/util.cfm?gpiv=2100065823.7092.415&gen=1

Balancing the Budget:

On Wednesday I spoke on the House floor about how best to balance the federal budget and reduce the deficit. Click below to see my remarks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vRMGHEx7yM

Unemployment Insurance:

On Wednesday I voted to extend unemployment insurance for millions of Americans across the country, but the bill did not have enough Republican support to pass. People who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own need their unemployment benefits as they continue to seek work. It is vital that we extend unemployment insurance to the millions of Americans struggling to put food on the table and pay their rent. This extension would bring some much needed peace of mind and financial relief to countless families across the country.

Editorial : Congressman Cohen is kinda like, in a jungle (in congress) fighting lions with a switch ! Thank you Rep. Cohen for fighting for the middle class !

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Trade ~ Trade ~ Trade ! ~ Fix it or Nix it !


Trade is the Problem ! Until it is fixed...Our Economy will Continue to Fail !

We Need to save Union City Goodyear Plant !

I have written many times about our trade problem. I am deeply concerned by the rapid decline of our manufacturing sector, which imperils our position as the world's strongest economy. Over 5 million manufacturing jobs have been lost in just the last 10 years - 2.4 million are the result of our trade deficit with China. Senate passage of H.R. 2378 - a bill to deter China from its market-distorting practice of currency manipulation - should be a top priority before Congress adjourns. Most economists believe that currency manipulation gives Chinese manufactured goods a 40 percent cost advantage when shipped into our market and an equivalent disadvantage for our goods when they enter China. Left unchecked, this policy stands in the way of free and fair trade, job creation, and a higher standard of living for millions of Americans. Confronted with stiff international pressure, China made a phony pledge in June 2010 to restore flexibility to its exchange rate and allow market forces to determine the value of the Yuan. However, the value of the Yuan has risen just 2 percent since that announcement - a far cry from the 40 percent undervaluation that is fueling a massive and ever-expanding trade deficit for our nation. History shows that strong action by Congress will bring positive results for American workers and companies. The Senate voted overwhelmingly in 2005 to penalize China for currency manipulation, and the result was a 21 percent appreciation of the Yuan in the months that followed. Unfortunately, China has restored its mercantilist currency policy and American jobs are in jeopardy. The House has already taken decisive action. On September 30, 2010, the House showed a rare moment of bipartisan cooperation by voting 348-79 to pass H.R. 2378, the Currency Reform for Fair Trade Act, sponsored by Congressmen Tim Ryan (D-OH) and Tim Murphy (R-PA). Now the Senate must act before closing out the 111th Congress. This issue is too important to postpone any longer. With each day that passes without action, more jobs are lost in my community and the tipping point of no return for our economy and middle-class America gets closer and closer. Ending China's currency manipulation will create more than 750,000 good American jobs at no cost to the U.S. Treasury. In fact, the anticipated growth created by such a
move could lower our budget deficit by as much as $500 billion over the next six years.
Fortunately, it is not too late to act.
I am counting on you to take
action to preserve our jobs, especially Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Union City, Tennessee and insist on a level playing field for American workers and businesses.
Please vote for H.R. 2378 and send the bill to President Obama for his signature. If you live in Tennessee ? click on title of this article or link below !
Contact Senator`s Alexander and Corker. Urge them to vote for this bill !
H.R. 2378

http://www.tennesseeanytime.org/government/elected.html

Sincerely,

Don Jones = Underdog

Friday, November 19, 2010

Social Security ~ A Lifeline & It`s Our Money !



Call Congress on November 30th to Protect Social Security!


The Social Security Works & Strengthen Social Security (SSS) Campaign wants your help in flooding Capitol Hill with thousands of phone calls to protect Social Security on Tuesday, November 30,2010 a national call-in day. The goal of each call will be to urge elected officials to oppose both benefit cuts to Social Security and the raising of the retirement age. As time nears for the full Fiscal Commission to release their official proposal, it will also be important to urge elected officials to oppose the Commission’s proposals to cut Social Security. The SSS Campaign is providing an email message, call-in script, and the following phone number for November 30: 1- 866-529-7630. Watch for these materials to come by e-mail next week. Tell Congress “NO!” to Social Security benefit cuts, and to keep their hands off Social Security!

GAO: Raising Retirement Age Would Hit Low-Income Workers, Minorities Extra Hard

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report on Friday highlighting the risks of raising the retirement age. The Senate Aging Committee Chair, Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI), had requested the report to address potential problems Americans would face with raising the Early Eligibility Age (EEA), the earliest eligibility age at which workers first qualify for retirement benefits, or the Full Retirement Age (FRA). The report found that raising the retirement age for Social Security would disproportionately hurt low-income workers and minorities, and increase disability claims by older people unable to work. The projected spike in disability claims could harm Social Security's finances, because disability benefits typically are higher than early retirement payments, GAO concluded. Under current law, people can start drawing reduced, early retirement benefits from Social Security at age 62. Full benefits are available at 66, a threshold gradually increasing to 67 for people who were born in 1960 or later. The fiscal commission's leaders, Bowles and Simpson, last week proposed a gradual increase in the full retirement age, to 69 in about 2075. The early retirement age would go to 64 the same year. About one-fourth of workers age 60 and 61 - just under the early retirement age - reported a health condition that limited their ability to work. Among those older workers, African-Americans and Hispanics were much more likely to report fair or poor health than whites, according to the report. “Raising the retirement age would make it impossible for many workers to continue to work in their current conditions, while crippling their eligibility for retirement benefits,“The GAO’s report has many striking statistics that show the harm in raising the retirement age.
To read the report, click here: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11125.pdf. <

Editorial : what part of "NO", do our Republican friends not understand ? Keep your hands off of Social Security !



China & The Unions ? "Long Read ~ But, Informative" !






Wages, Conditions Improve as Workers in China form Unions
By Kathy Chu and Michelle Yun, USA TODAY

> http://www.usatoday.com/money/world/2010-11-19-Chinalabor_cv_N.htm <

SHAJING, China — In many ways, Lan Yimin represents the new generation of Chinese factory workers. She wants fair working conditions. Time off to socialize. And a job that pays enough so she can open a milk tea business one day.
Lan, 22, is one of millions of migrant workers powering the electronics, furniture and toy factories in China's Pearl River Delta. While she's following in her parents' footsteps on the assembly line, unlike them, she's less willing to "eat bitterness" — as the Chinese call it — and toil away for meager pay and benefits. She has more job options and better access to information. And as China's economy booms, her generation is becoming bolder. "The young generation has a wider social circle; we talk more about factory conditions and we know more about our legal rights," Lan says at a workers' center in this industrial town where she attends seminars on handling late wages and contract termination.

INFLATION THREAT: China orders banks to boost reserves
Workers' growing awareness and their willingness to take action are slowly pushing up wages and improving conditions in the manufacturing industry. The Chinese government already moved to increase salaries and labor standards a few years ago. Now it is trying to maintain a delicate balance of improving income levels for workers while not scaring away foreign corporations with higher labor costs. "That's USA !"

As wages and other costs rise here, U.S. companies will have to decide whether to take their production to other Asian manufacturing hubs or increase prices for American consumers.

This year, strikes at Honda factories and a spate of suicides at Foxconn — a maker of electronics for U.S. companies such as Apple and Dell — raised alarm among corporations and the government that the era of the docile worker had ended.
Strikes still happen each week in China, labor rights groups say, but the government doesn't allow them to be reported. The labor unrest is even inspiring strikes in Cambodia and Vietnam, whose workers say they're emboldened by their Chinese colleagues' examples.

For now, factory workers in China "are only making economic demands, not political," says Chang Kai, a labor relations expert at People's University in Beijing who has assisted workers with strike negotiations.

But history shows that labor movements don't necessarily follow logical, or peaceful, paths. U.S. railroad and steelworkers staged massive strikes during the late 1800s that led to violence when authorities intervened.

In China, "If the government does not treat the workers' struggle for collective bargaining seriously, if it decides to treat these demands as political, then this will turn into a political struggle," says Han Dongfang, a labor activist deported to Hong Kong for his role in the Tienanmen Square protest of 1989.

To a certain extent, the Chinese government is tolerating worker unrest because it recognizes that higher wages translate into more spending that can stimulate the economy. The government wants all residents to share in the country's economic growth, says Juzhong Zhuang, deputy chief economist of the Asian Development Bank, because "high income inequality can lead to social problems that undermine long-term economic growth." The challenge is that the government wants to "offer more protection for workers, but it is also exposed to a lot of pressure from companies" resisting change, says Debby Chan, a project officer for Students & Scholars Against Corporate Misbehavior (SACOM), a workers' advocacy group.

Labor unrest on rise

After this year's labor unrest, the government is stepping up efforts to unionize companies, says Lesli Ligorner, a Shanghai-based partner at Paul Hastings law firm who represents multinationals doing business in China. The idea is that if workers join the state-controlled All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) — the only union allowed in the country — they'll have an avenue other than strikes to air their grievances.

Yet having more companies establish unions does little good if those unions don't represent workers, says Han, who founded Hong Kong-based worker advocacy group China Labour Bulletin. "If I'm thirsty and you give me another cup with no water in it, I'll still be thirsty."

In Beijing, Liu Rongli is trying to make his employer more responsive to workers.

Inside a vast workshop, where crane operators sort heavy slabs of metal, Liu calls to order a meeting of the company's trade union. A shout to co-worker Gao Wei, and the full membership is soon sitting down in a grimy room.
Both of them.
The trade union was established against the odds in September 2010, thanks to Liu's perseverance.

While the group is still under the umbrella of the ACFTU, the new union better represents workers, according to Gao, because "we have a way to negotiate with management."

The ACFTU didn't respond to requests for an interview. But one trade union representative describes union meetings as straightforward affairs. The employer "guarantees major decisions in advance," according to Liu Ying, a union worker in a large, state-owned energy company in Dalian, eastern China. "The trade union selects delegates from among all the workers, people we can trust, then these representatives always raise their hands in approval."

Because the union is a "state tool, labor rights fall secondary to social stability," acknowledges Qiao Jian, a director at the China Institute of Industrial Relations.
The union does have its strengths, Qiao says. As an offshoot of the Communist Party, the union can implement changes quickly for the benefit of the country's workers.

But until major change occurs, and until workers have viable options to air their complaints, strikes will keep rising, predicts Li Qiang, founder of China Labor Watch, a group with offices in New York and Southern China.

No official numbers are available on strikes. But labor cases heard by arbitration committees more than doubled from 2000 through 2007 to 350,182, according to Chinese government data. In 2008, arbitrated cases surged to 693,000 after laws took effect making it cheaper for workers to pursue arbitration and requiring employers to provide written contracts.

Young factory workers are frustrated because they're generally not sharing in the country's economic boom, says Eli Friedman, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of California-Berkeley, who spent a year and a half in China studying labor disputes. "They want to make a life in the city," Friedman says. "But if you're making 1,000 yuan a month, it's not going to cut it."

As workers demand higher living standards, companies will have to adapt, says Jeremy Prepscius, Asia managing director for BSR, which advises members on sustainable business strategies.
"The old way of managing labor is looking at workers as a plentiful resource," Prepscius says. "The new way is looking at workers as a scarce resource."

Higher price tags in U.S.

In the Pearl River Delta — known as the factory of the world — a labor shortage is giving migrant workers leverage to negotiate better wages and benefits. Evidence of this can be found along Southern China's dusty streets.

In Dongguan city, where three of every four residents are migrant workers, for-hire signs taped to telephone poles compete for people's attention. Brightly colored banners hang from factory gates;
one offers 1,300 yuan a month, about $200 U.S., for eight-hour workdays, 26 days a month.

Inside a factory of TAL Group, thousands of workers churn out as many as 33,600 shirts and 7,200 pairs of pants daily, sometimes to Chinese pop music bellowing overhead. Many work 10 hours a day.

Orderly chaos reigns on the factory floor, a blur of flying hands and whirring sewing machines. Every 35 to 45 seconds, a dress shirt is sown for clients such as Brooks Bros. and J.C. Penney. An electronic panel hangs from the ceiling, counting down how much clothing remains to be completed during the shift.

While TAL has added employees to its busy production lines, it's been harder to recruit them because of the labor shortage, admits Roger Lee, the company's chief operating officer.

Labor costs have surged 25% this year due to rising wages and benefits, forcing the company to become more efficient.

Yet even with productivity improvements, higher costs mean "we ultimately have to pass along" certain expenses to clients, Lee says. U.S. retailers then have to decide whether to raise prices for consumers.

In the textile industry, labor accounts for as much as a third of production expenses, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit, meaning that U.S. consumers are likely to see higher price tags when costs in China rise. In other industries, where labor represents a small percentage of total costs, U.S. companies may be willing to bear one-time hikes.

While higher wages may crimp the profits of U.S. companies making goods in China, they also boost the bottom line of those that sell products here. As Chinese consumers' household income rises, there will be a "stronger market for U.S. goods and services," says Sandra Polaski, U.S. deputy undersecretary of Labor.

Unsafe working conditions

As workers scramble to meet production quotas, accidents and injuries can occur. Ruan Libing worked at Elec-Tech's appliance factory in Zhuhai, Southern China, for a month when a molding machine mangled his left hand. It had to be amputated.

Ruan, 22, is one of about 60 workers who lost fingers or hands or had other accidents at Elec-Tech's Zhuhai factory from July 2009 through June 2010, according to an August report by SACOM, the workers' advocacy group. The group blames the accidents on the pressure to work faster, unsafe machines and insufficient employee training.

Eva Chan, vice president of sales and marketing for Elec-Tech, says the company recently upgraded all machines in its Zhuhai factory so they require two hands to operate. No accidents have occurred since then, and the supplier — whose toasters and blenders sell at U.S. retailers such as Walmart, Bloomingdale's and Williams-Sonoma — hasn't lost any clients, according to Chan.

Walmart is "actively monitoring" conditions at the supplier's factories and has asked an independent group to evaluate the machines' safety, says the retailer's spokesman, Kevin Gardner.

Unsafe working environments and inadequate pay are common, according to Li, of China Labor Watch. U.S. companies share responsibility, he says, because "they're encouraging the exploitation of Chinese laborers by hiring factories based on the lowest price and the fastest production."

This criticism, however, ignores the fact that U.S. companies are investing more money and resources to monitor their suppliers, says Drew Thompson, director of China studies at the Nixon Center, a conservative Washington, D.C., think tank. "By and large, American companies are doing it right."

Still, labor experts generally agree that China has a long way to go in improving working conditions. And the surge in job-related strikes and lawsuits may signal that workers are no longer willing to stand idly by.

The developments are "incredibly hopeful," says Charles Kernaghan, director of the National Labor Committee, a workers' advocacy group. "You're talking about the biggest working class in the world rising up. Change will come through these people."

Editorial : China`s State operated Unions are not gonna cut it ! Only through worker organized Unions will workers prevail. Then, Chinese Government may turn organizing unions into Tennemon square ! The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is building a 100 million dollar plant in Dalian China now. It seems that livable wages are not part of the equation ! Let`s see now, We build plants in other countries and hire cheap labor and then import the product back to the United States, no tariff involved. We then close our plants and put thousands of people out of work in the USA ! Seems fair to me, seem fair to YOU ? Oh, did I mention, the price does not come down ! one more thing, Goodyear cannot sell their tire in China for five years from start of production. Me thinks that, we need ever who negotiates this crap, to negotiate for USA ! Our Politicians have sold us OUT ! Thanks to Buddy M. for this one !

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Jim Hightower | THE RESILIENT GREEDINESS OF WALL STREET EXECUTIVES


THE RESILIENT GREEDINESS OF WALL STREET EXECUTIVES
Tuesday, November 16, 2010 Posted by Jim Hightower

It appears to be a truly amazing feat of magic. Right before your eyes, this thing rises into the air on its own, with no wires or mechanical devices giving it lift, and it hovers there effortlessly. But it's not magic, for magic is an illusion, and this gravity-defying phenomenon of perpetual levitation is real. What is this "it" that keeps floating up, up, up? The annual bonuses paid to Wall Street's top bankers.
By the laws of economics, if not physics, bonuses should fall to earth this year, because the bankers have performed poorly. Trading is down, profits are flat (despite being given trillions of dollars in almost-interest-free money by the feds), firms are firing lower-level employees, and banker greed has ruined the public reputations of the financial giants. Who cares, shriek the big shots – its bonus time, baby, so grab all you can! The CEOs of Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and others have set aside billions of dollars to flood their executive suites with bonus cash at the end of the year – money that should go to shareholders.
Their claim is: "We deserve it, for we took low pay during the crash of 2008-2009." For example, Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs' boss was paid a mere $9 million last year, so this year he wants that "sacrifice" to be made up to him. However, lest you worry that poor Lloyd's family needed food stamps to make ends meet in that tough $9-million year, note that he had a bit of a cushion, having pocketed a record Wall Street payday of $68 million in 2007 – even as his bank was crumbling. One executive pay analyst says he assumed that bonuses would go down this year. But, he said, "I underestimated the industry's resiliency." By "resiliency," I assume he was referring to the industry's incurable GREED. !

"Wall Street Gets Its Groove Back, And Big Pay, Too," The New York Times, November 4, 2010.

"Wall Street’s Profit Engines Slow Down," http://www.nytimes.com/ ," September 19, 2010.
Editorial : Folks, this is unbelievable. But, YOU better Believe it !

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Mourning in America ~ Death of the Middle Class !


Mourning in America: Death of the Middle Class

The Truth, The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth !
by Leo W. Gerard, President USWA
Nov 16, 2010

The deficit commission report issued last week is another Saturday night special pressed to the temple of the American middle class.

“Turn over your money and your benefits or your country will die,” the report screams at workers. “You want your country to go bankrupt? No? Then you gotta delay retirement, get less from Social Security, pay more for health insurance and lose your precious few income tax breaks like the one that helps pay your mortgage while the banker is breathing down your neck right now.”

For 30 years, rich conservatives have successfully threatened the American middle class this way, ever since that rich, conservative Ronald Reagan converted the White House into a castle.

The result is a country with greater income inequality than during the age of corporate robber barons at the turn of the 20th century.
It is a country whose 21st century robber barons, the richest 1 percent of Americans, take nearly one-quarter of all income and demand that politicians relieve them of their obligations. The rich—hedge fund owners who rake in billions, Wall Street banksters handed bonuses in the millions, CEOs paid eight-figure golden parachutes after they mess up—insist that politicians place government debt burdens on the middle class, the unemployed, the elderly, the struggling young, people whose income has stagnated for three decades. The co-chairmen of the deficit commission complied with that mandate from the flush when they recommended the middle class bear the brunt of the cost of reducing the deficit. Simultaneously, conservatives in Congress are acquiescing by insisting on extending tax breaks for the nation’s wealthiest. Those are the very tax breaks that contributed dramatically to creating the debt—the one that the deficit commission now wants heaped on workers’ backs. This will be the death of the nation’s strength—its successful working class. Without the slightest regret or hesitation, the rich are killing the great American middle, rendering it a casualty of their shirked social responsibilities. Their campaign has been abetted by Republicans since Ronald Reagan. The Gipper contended slashing taxes for the wealthy would increase revenues for the government. Republican George H.W. Bush rightly ridiculed Reaganomics as voodoo. In the GOP years between the beginning of Reagan in 1981 and the end of Bush II in 2009, the federal deficit exploded as Republican presidents failed to control spending and repeatedly cut taxes for the rich. Reagan reduced the rate on the richest first down to 50 percent, then to 28 percent. The resulting budget deficit converted the United States from the world’s largest international creditor to its largest debtor. And now, the deficit commission sends the bulk of the bill for voodoo economics to the middle class, not the rich. While Reagan gave the rich those breaks, income inequality increased. The share of total income taken by the richest 5 percent grew from 16.5 percent, the year before he took office, to 18.3 percent, the year before he left. In that same time, the share of total income that went to the poorest 20 percent of households fell from 4.2 percent to 3.8 percent. Democrat Bill Clinton fulfilled a campaign promise by increasing taxes on the rich—to a 39.6 percent marginal rate. He balanced the federal budget and left Bush II with a surplus. Then Bush II squandered it. He gave the rich more tax breaks, accumulated debts larger than all those created by previous presidents combined and worsened income inequality. During his administration, from 2002 to 2007, the pretax income of the richest 1 percent increased 10 percent every year. Over that same period, the median income for working Americans declined and the poverty rate rose. From Reagan through Bush II, more than four-fifths of the total increase in U.S. income went to the richest 1 percent. Hedge fund owners, whose income is literally in the billions, pay income taxes at 15 percent – lower than the rate paid by their secretaries, who earn far less in a year than any of the top 10 hedgers do in half an hour. Wall Street recklessness crashed the U.S. economy, throwing millions of middle income earners out of their jobs and their homes. The banksters went to Washington and got politicians to hand them bailout billions, and now those Wall Streeters plan to increase their bonuses — while unemployment remains stuck at 9.6 percent in the Main Street economy. It is those guys, bankers grabbing year end bonuses totaling two and three times what middle class earners get for a year’s labor; it is the five-home wealthy demanding that the foreclosed-on middle class suffer for the deficit. The rich, who have received the greatest benefits from this society, have no intention of paying their share of this national responsibility. The deficit, the Social Security shortfall, difficulties with Medicare – they could all be solved if the nation returned to taxing policies that existed under Republican President Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, when the rate on top earners was 91 percent. That was not even the high point. In the mid-1940s it was 94 percent. Generally it fluctuated between 81 percent in 1940 and 70 percent when Reagan began slashing it in 1981. Those rates may sound confiscatory now, but it’s not like the rich actually paid them after they subtracted out all of their exemptions, deductions, loopholes, special deals, tricks and wiles. The dozen years in the 1950s and 1960s when the rate on the richest officially was 91 percent is a time considered by many Americans to be among the nation’s greatest for the middle class, a period when American workers could afford to buy homes, send their kids to college and travel across American on vacation. There’s no talk of that now. Raising taxes on the rich now is considered ludicrous. Ridiculous. The whole Social Security shortfall could be solved if the rich paid taxes on their entire incomes, not just the first $110,000, a break that means the wealthy pay a smaller percentage if their income toward Social Security than the impoverished. But the deficit commission didn’t propose that. No, the rich have succeeded in eliminating as a possibility their paying an increased tax share. Now, the only consideration is cutting their taxes. They didn’t hold an actual Saturday night special to anyone’s head. The rich are snake oil salesmen slick, Bernie Madoff-style schemers. They sold voodoo economics to America, and now they’re intent on making the middle class pay for what that policy has wrought in deficits.
Reagan’s re-election ad was wrong. He didn’t institute “Morning in America.” It was mourning for the once great American middle class.

Editorial : I did`nt originally write this, but I could have !

While its proven that tax rebates to the wealthiest have not created any jobs, it was the slave trade agreements with foreign countries that created all the outsourcing to virtually eliminate manufacturing as we once knew it. It was the American corporation that sold us out and a government that enabled it. I do not see how we can move forward without “fair” trade agreements. We cannot compete with labor that will work for $50 a month. If this does`nt bother you, you must be rich ?
Service sector jobs at ten bucks an hour, living in section 8 with food stamps is not my idea of the American dream.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

November is Pulmonary Hypertension Awareness Month !


November is Pulmonary Hypertension Awareness Month !
by : Don Jones...11/16/10
Heart-Transplant & PH Patient, Vanderbilt University Hospital and Clinic


If you don`t know what Pulmonary Hypertension is ? Be glad. That tells me you or no one in your family or circle of friends have it either ? Well maybe ? Pulmonary Hypertension is often misdiagnosed. The symptoms are so like those of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) which include Emphysema. Remember, I am a 16 year post Heart-Transplant patient. Vanderbilt Pulmonology is one fine clinic, but, as one Dr. informed me, "We know a lot, but we don`t know everything". Lets talk my symptoms. I am unable to walk long distances, 20-yards without stopping and resting (catching my breath) Stairs are almost impossible. Hill`s ditto. Here`s one for you, Showering is bad, wears me out ! Clothes dressing, wears me out. Normal everyday chores almost completely out of the question. I seem to have good days and bad days ? If you see me out at a public place, and I`m sitting down, you would`nt know there was anything wrong with me. At times, my breathing seems improved, other times it seems worse. Drugs I am on. Revatio 20 mg. (sildenafil) three (3)times a day. Tyvaso (treprostinil) four(4) times daily. Tyvaso is an inhalant, I breathe into my lungs four times daily. Let me put it this way (Shortness of Breath Sucks!) Both of these drugs are expensive. Revatio is almost $1,300.00 per month.Tyvaso is, are you sitting down ? $13,000.00 per month. No, I do not pay for them, Medicare and my VEBA pay for them, or I would`nt be taking them. Are they helping ? Being an eternal optimist, I like to think so, but I`m not sure ? perhaps, I`m not worse ? There has been no dramatic change for the better in my breathing. Take care of your lungs, they are most sensitive and difficult to treat. I don`t think, I`ve mentioned it, but this disease Pulmonary Hypertension is mostly a female disease. Now, I`m male, but, I do have a Lady`s/Female Heart ! Go figure ! My Dr.`s at Vanderbilt Lung/Pulmonary are Dr. Ivan Robbins(upper right) and Dr. Anna Hemnes(upper left). They are both good Dr.`s and exceptional human beings. Having shared these things with you, let me encourage you, especially if your having breathing difficulty and have been diagnosed with (COPD), ask, could it be (PH)Pulmonary Hypertension ? This is a debilitating and deadly disease. The sooner you have a correct diagnosis, the better chance you have to beat it. As I said earlier, ("Shortness of Breath Sucks"!) (It also Kill`s !) If you have been Diagnosed with PAH you might find the following link interesting ?Do not try to absorb too much about this disease, without consulting your Dr. (It fool`s them, it will fool you.)




Monday, November 15, 2010

Extend Unemployment Benefits...YES !





November 15, 2010

National Call-In Day on Tuesday> 11/16/10 :

Tell U.S. Senators to Extend Unemployment Benefits !


Workers across America are still feeling the pain from our broken economy. Too many people have lost jobs, their homes and their ability to support their families. For 15 million jobless workers, unemployment benefits serve as a vital lifeline while they seek new jobs. At the end of this month, benefits will once again run out for many of them, with two million people losing benefits in December if the Senate doesn’t act. While this loss of basic assistance will be most devastating to individuals and families, it will also impact the larger economy. Estimates show that every dollar of unemployment benefits generates $1.61 of economic activity – which is far more effective than tax breaks for millionaires for stimulating the economy. The stakes could not be higher for millions of jobless workers and their families. Now is not the time to cut off the lifeline. > http://www.uswrr.org <

Please call your two Senators on:
Tuesday, November 16, toll-free at:
1-877-662-2889


(1.) Tell them your name and where you’re calling
from, and Ask them to
VOTE TO EXTEND UNEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS.
A high volume of calls is expected on Tuesday. If you can’t get through to the
Capitol switchboard using the number above, please call your Senators’ offices
directly. A listing can be found at:
Click below...for all U.S. Senators !

Editorial : Senator Lamar Alexander(R)Tennessee (top left) http://www.alexander.senate.gov/public
Senator Bob Corker(R)Tennessee(top right) http://www.corker.senate.gov/public
They probably won`t vote to extend, but you need to let them know, what you think, and how you would like them to vote !

Absolute Insanity ~ Tax Cuts for the Wealthy ! Have We All Gone Mad ?

'Absolute Insanity’ to Keep Bush Tax Cuts for Wealthy
by James Parks, Nov 12, 2010

Republicans on Capitol Hill want to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for the rich, which are set to expire at the end of the year. President Obama and congressional Democrats want to extend the cuts for middle- and lower-income families, but not for persons making $250,000 or more. The Bush tax cuts never came close to living up to the promise that they would create jobs—we actually lost private-sector jobs under the Bush administration. Extending the tax breaks for the wealthy also would add billions to the national deficit. In a statement today, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said it is “absolutely insane” that in these tough economic times some people want to continue the “tax give-aways to millionaires while working families are losing their jobs, their benefits and their homes.” We need to focus on creating jobs by giving tax breaks only to middle-class families and investing in rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure and green technologies. Millionaires and Wall Street already had their party, which tanked our economy and left Main Street stuck paying the bill. He urged the lame-duck session of Congress not to compromise on this issue.The election is over and now it’s time for politicians to show courage and stand and fight on these issues for working families. Let the millionaires fend for themselves for a change.

Read Trumka’s entire statement here, click on link below http://www.aflcio.org/mediacenter/prsptm/pr11122010a.cfm

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Social Security ~ Is it Safe ? Rep. Miller Says, YES !




Does Social Security Have WMD ?
By Rep. Brad Miller (D). Representative, North Carolina 13th District
Posted: November 12, 2010


The PowerPoint released by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, the co-chairs of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform ("The Deficit Commission"), said we should

"Reform Social Security for its own sake, not for deficit reduction."
No kidding. Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit. Not now, not ever !
Critics of Social Security have frequently made alarming claims about the future of the system to support calls for "reform." President George W. Bush conceded in 2005 that "it's not bankrupt yet," but said we couldn't "wait until it's bankrupt." "The problem with that notion is that the longer you wait, the more difficult it is to fix," President Bush said. "You realize that this system of ours is going to be short the difference between obligations and money coming in, by about $11 trillion, unless we act... That's trillion with a 'T.'"

That does sound scary.

So what was the period for that projected shortfall ? It was for the "indefinite future." Forecasts of the end times are usually the work of religious prophets, not economists or actuaries. According to the Book of Revelation, at the end of days earthquakes will level mountains, hail will fall mixed with fire, and a beast with seven heads and ten horns will arise from the seas. In that context, a shortfall in the Social Security system just doesn't seem like that big a deal. At least President Bush used the term "projected shortfall," but Republican talking heads sent forth to battle on cable television routinely used the word "deficit," implying that we'd have to pick up the difference. No, we wouldn't. Here's how it would work if we just left the current law alone. The system has been running a substantial surplus for a generation because the Baby Boom has been working and paying payroll taxes, and the Baby Boom dwarfs the generation now receiving benefits. The surplus has gone into the Trust Fund, which now stands at about $2.6 trillion (That's trillion with a "T.") As the Baby Boom retires, the system will stop running a surplus later this decade. Then the system will pay full benefits, including cost-of-living adjustments, from payroll taxes and the interest from the Trust Fund. About a decade after that, payroll taxes and interest on the Trust Fund will not be enough to pay full benefits, including cost of living adjustments. Then the system will pay full benefits, including cost of living adjustments, from payroll taxes, interest and the principal of the Trust Fund.
Around 2037
, the principal of the Trust Fund will be exhausted. Under the existing law, the system will then reduce the benefits to what can be covered by payroll taxes. The projection is that the benefits would then be reduced by about 22 percent. A 22-percent reduction in benefits is pretty unattractive, especially if the finances of the middle class are as fragile in 30 years as they are now. But proposals to "fix" Social Security by reducing benefits would really just swap one reduction of benefits for another. Paul Krugman argues that raising the retirement age is a reduction of benefits that works to the disadvantage of blue-collar workers: While average life expectancy is indeed rising, it's doing so mainly for high earners, precisely the people who need Social Security least. Life expectancy in the bottom half of the income distribution has barely inched up over the past three decades. So the Bowles-Simpson proposal is basically saying that janitors should be forced to work longer because these days corporate lawyers are living to a ripe old age. Would blue-collar workers be better off if we raised the retirement age or let an across-the-board cut in benefits go into effect in 30 years or so? Isn't that a question we should ask ? More to the point, Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit. "Since Social Security is legally prohibited from ever spending more than it has collected in taxes," Dean Baker correctly argues, "it cannot under the law contribute to the deficit." The Social Security system "fell outside of the mandate" of the Deficit Commission, Baker said. "They must have been expecting extra credit." We are right to worry about Social Security, and we are right to worry about our long-term deficit. But the two are completely distinct.
So proposing to "reform" Social Security because of long-term deficits is like invading Iraq because Afghanistan attacked us.
Or maybe the Social Security system has weapons of mass destruction.

Editorial : It`s politics as usual, in regard to SS# ! Ask, why do the Republicans want your $ocial $ecurity ? They say to privatize it. Now, What does privatize SS # mean ? Lets see, put it on wall street. Now looking at the recent fiasco on Wall-Street, that would be a great idea ! I know, we can take it to Vegas and gamble with it, ( Makes more sense that Wall-Street) Com`on folks, wake up and smell the honey( I`m from the South) suckle ! Stop politicizing SS# ! Keep the politicians hands and mouths off of it ! Including our Presidents ! SS# problem solved !

Saturday, November 13, 2010

Don`t Extend Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthy ! Or Will Obama Fold ?





Tell Congress: Don't Extend the Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthy
The Bush tax cuts, like the Iraq War, are one of the primary drivers of our large federal deficit. And like the Iraq War, the Bush tax cuts were sold to the public through outright deception.

The snake oil the Bush administration peddled was that the tax cuts, which overwhelmingly went to the rich and the ultra-rich, would spur the economy.

Now that we're facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, many so-called "conservatives," joined with corporatist "moderates," are singing the same tune. They are demanding we extend the tax giveaways for the wealthy (set to expire at the end of the year) at a cost of $700 billion over the next decade.
Meanwhile,
these same members of Congress are demanding deep cuts to the social safety net for the poor, the middle class, the unemployed and the elderly.
There is very little that so clearly demonstrates the callous venality of some members of Congress than the simultaneous demand to give Paris Hilton a tax cut while pushing benefit cuts to Social Security.

Tell Congress:
Don't extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Click below.
Tax cuts for economic elites aren't free and they aren't effective. The government still needs revenue and giving away money to millionaires (who on average would receive over $100,000 in tax cuts per year if all the Bush tax cuts are extended) takes away from the money we can spend to help the victims of this economic downturn. There is simply no excuse for Congress to plead poverty when it comes to helping those in need while literally giving it away to those who don't need it.
Congress needs step up to the plate and make sure we don't continue one of the biggest economic injustices of the Bush era. Tell Congress:
Don't extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

The petition reads:

"Let the Bush tax cuts that affect only the richest 2% of Americans expire on schedule at the end of the year. Congress needs to step up to the plate and make sure we don't continue one of the biggest economic injustices of the Bush era."
Complete the following to sign the petition. You'll receive periodic updates on offers and activism opportunities.
Tax cuts for economic elites aren't free and they aren't effective. The government still needs revenue and giving away money to millionaires (who on average would receive over $100,000 in tax cuts per year if all the Bush tax cuts are extended) takes away from the money we can spend to help the victims of this economic downturn. There is simply no excuse for Congress to plead poverty when it comes to helping those in need while literally giving it away to those who don't need it. Congress needs step up to the plate and make sure we don't continue one of the biggest economic injustices of the Bush era.
Tell Congress: Don't extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Just click on link below or the title of this article.