Health Care ~ Public Option...7/30/09

Life Begins after the Transplant...The Wait is Over !

Organ Transplant Waiting List...7/03/2009
National List :
Kidney --- 80,092
Liver--- 15,821
Pancreas---1,495
Kidney/Pancreas---2,222
Heart---2,838
Lung---1,911
Heart/Lung---81
Intestine---221
Total : 102,282
Tennessee :
Kidney---1,782
Liver---227
Pancreas---12
Kidney/Pancreas---19
Heart---104
Lung---28
Heart/Lung---0
Intestine---0
Total: 2,155
Did You Know That:
The largest group of Americans awaiting organ transplants are those ages 50 - 64.
More than 40,000 people will be added to the national transplant waiting list this year. Just over 28,000 transplants were performed last year.
More than 20,000 organs, that could be transplanted are buried or creamated each year.
People of all ages can be tissue and organ donors. Overall health, not age, is what`s important.
Organs or parts of organs, that can be transplanted include, kidney, liver, heart, lung, pancreas, cornea, and intestine. The Heart is the only organ that cannot come from a living donor.
Organ donation does not conflict with the tenets of any major religion.
You can register to donate at most state motor vehicle departments.
Even if you are a registered donor, family members ultimately decide whether your organs may be donated after you die. So clarifying your wishes to friends and family is essential.
"Give The Gift of Life, Be an Organ/Tissue Donor, It`s the Masonic thing to Do " !
H.R. 45...7/24/09 = GUN CONTROL...

Health Care...7/23/09
The Waiting Game !...7/22/09
By : Don Jones, Htx.#189-Vanderbilt

Alexander Votes Against Kennedy Health Care Bill


AFL-CIO Launches New Online Voting Record Tool...
Alexander Says Kennedy Health Care Bill Means “Trillions in Debt and Putting Gov’t Between Patient and Doctor”July 8th, 2009 - WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) today made the following remarks on the floor of the U.S. Senate regarding the Kennedy health care bill: • “The Republican vision is that there won’t be someone in between a patient and a doctor who would get in the way of the treatment or the care you need. And our great fear is that the Democratic proposal would put the government in between you and your doctor—with the government in charge of rationing.” • “I think of the pregnant women in rural counties in Tennessee who have to drive all the way to Memphis or Nashville to get prenatal health care because their OB-GYN’s medical malpractice cases have driven up insurance costs, leaving them no way to get health care . . . . All the Republican proposals would assure that everyone would be covered—that preexisting conditions would not disqualify you. The issue before us is if we’re going to add trillions to the debt and put the government in between the patient and the doctor.” • “We’re concerned that the administration has proposed over the next ten years more new debt, three times as much new debt actually, as was spent in all of World War II (in today’s dollars).” • “40 percent of doctors won’t see Medicaid patients for all their services. 40 percent of doctors. So if we say, ‘Congratulations, we’re going to run up the federal debt and add a big state tax in order to stuff you into a program in which 40 percent of the doctors today won’t see you,’ it’s like giving you a ticket to a bus system that doesn’t have any buses.” • “This is the biggest issue before our country today. It is certainly the biggest issue before Congress. Republicans have our proposals on the table. We’re ready to go to work. We want to make sure that preexisting conditions don’t leave out qualified people. We want to make sure that everyone is covered and that we have access to health care at a price the family budget can afford. And we’re resolute in our determination not to add trillions to the national debt and not to dump new debt on the states.” Alexander is a member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pension (HELP).
Editorial : What a load of crap. Dear Senator Alexander(R) Tennessee, Stop being an obstructionist ! Is it too much to ask, for the same health insurance, that we Tennesseans provide you ? I think not ! Are you and Mitch McConnell(R) Kentucky brothers ?
Retirees Praise Health Care Bills from U.S. House, Senate HELP Panel


Manufacturing a Better Future for AmericaThe United States cannot revive its economy without first rebuilding the nation’s manufacturing base, several experts say. While most of us understand how devastating the loss of a plant can be to a community and to the economy, policymakers don’t get it, they add. During a roundtable discussion yesterday in Washington, D.C., several contributors to a new book, Manufacturing a Better Future for America, spelled out the case for a bold new U.S. industrial policy. Simply put: For nearly 300 years, the United States invested in producing goods and, as a result, became the richest nation in history. But for the past few decades, policymakers have systematically dismantled our manufacturing base through bad tax policies and short-sighted trade agreements that encourage consumption of cheap foreign imports and provide incentives for U.S.-based companies to export jobs. As a result, some 40,000 U.S. manufacturing plants closed between 2001 and 2008, resulting in the loss of millions of family-supporting jobs. From 2001 to 2007, some 2.3 million jobs were lost just from the nation’s huge trade deficit with China alone. Manufacturing is the economic engine of the United States, and the Obama administration must commit to an industrial strategy that puts people back to work and focuses on making things, says United Steelworkers (USW) President Leo Gerard. Scott Paul, executive director of the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM), which sponsored the roundtable and published the book, points out that “much of the conventional wisdom about manufacturing is wrong or out of date.” To build a strong economy that works, we must understand what’s really happening today. A big factor in the decline of manufacturing is so-called free trade. The reality is that in a global economy, some other countries don’t always play by the rules, says Economic Strategy Institute President Clyde Prestowitz, who co-authored the chapter on trade. Many nations are actively pursuing investment and production while the United States depends on imports and lets its manufacturing move offshore, he says. At the same time, those nations have laws that restrict the amount of goods that can be imported from other countries. Prestowitz quotes a top executive of a U.S.-based company building a plant in China saying: “Everybody knows that if you are going to sell anything in China, you have to make it in China,” and the same thing is true in many of the U.S. trading partners. Those countries have thriving manufacturing bases while U.S. lawmakers allow ours to dwindle away, he adds. Several of the panelists pointed out the Obama administration’s hesitation to insist that the nation’s automakers use U.S.-made parts as an example of the need for the White House to more actively support U.S. manufacturing. Peter Navarro, a professor at the University of California-Irvine, who wrote the chapter on foreign incentives, points out that China, for example, manipulates its currency to keep its prices low and make imports expensive, benefits from lax environmental and health rules and forces companies to turn over their technology to do business in China. At the same time, the promise of new green jobs is not enough to revive the economy alone, Prestowitz said. It actually could increase the trade deficit because so many of the green materials are made overseas. While U.S. workers may get jobs installing green technology, the real wealth is going to the producers. The bottom line, says Richard McCormick, editor of the book, is that the United States is broke because it has stopped producing what it consumes. The mindset among America’s economic elite that the country does not need an industrial base has put the country and the world economy in a ditch. Only with a revitalized manufacturing base can America assure itself a prosperous and hopeful future. The AFL-CIO long has called for new policies to revitalize manufacturing, including: Fair trade policies that reduce the U.S. trade deficit, protect U.S. trade laws and require inclusion of enforceable workers’ rights and environmental standards in trade agreements.
Revised tax laws that eliminate incentives for corporations to move production overseas and punish those that do; opposition to reform of the Foreign Sales Corporation (FSC) tax that would encourage shifting manufacturing jobs overseas; replacing FSC with tax incentives that help American manufacturers create U.S. jobs and help workers cope with retiree health care and pension costs. Legislation that penalizes companies that incorporate overseas to avoid taxes and denies government contracts to these companies. Strengthening the manufacturing base for national defense and homeland security through procurement reform, enhanced “Buy American” requirements, an updated assessment of critical defense manufacturing capabilities and limits to “offsets” that drain critical technology and good jobs.
Editorial : Saving America; One Job at a Time ! End so called Free Trade now !

House Unveils Health Care Bill with Public Option, No Benefits Tax; Vote Sought by RecessComprehensive health care reform took a significant step forward this afternoon when House leaders unveiled the final draft of a bill that contains a public health insurance plan option and shared responsibility, including an employer “pay or play” requirement—while not taxing the health care benefits working families receive through their job. A vote could come by the end of July.The bill closely follows the health care blueprint developed by the House Education and Labor, Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means committees and includes cost containment and insurance market reforms to help stop private insurance industry abuses. For a closer look at the House bill, click here. Says House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) about the bill: Over the coming weeks, Congress will continue working with President Obama to make health care reform work for middle-class families in America….We have a path to success: lowering costs for consumers and businesses; giving greater choice to Americans, including keeping your current doctor or plan if you like them; improving the quality of your care; putting doctors, not insurance companies, back in charge. The money spent on providing health care coverage is tax-deductible to the employer, and the employee is not taxed on it. Some 160 million people have health care benefits tied to the workplace. But many congressional Republicans and conservative groups have pushed for a health care benefits tax. Rather than taxing workers’ benefits provided by employers, the House bill calls for a small tax surcharge on individuals making more than $280,000 a year and married couples with annual incomes over $350,000. AFL-CIO President John Sweeney says: The House proposal meets President Obama’s goals by controlling runaway health care costs, offering the American people real choices and expanding access to quality health care. It does not ask the American people to pay more for what they already have. In fact, this legislation offers the real promise of improving quality, increasing access and reducing costs, all at the same time. The bill’s introduction comes at a time when the health care industry, including the private health insurance community, is spending $1.4 million a day on lobbying efforts, according to a recent report in the Washington Post. According to disclosure records, firms spent more than $126 million in the first quarter of 2009 to pay for more than 350 former lawmakers, congressional staffers and executive branch officials to lobby Congress. Many of the firms are trying to block or weaken health care reform, especially provisions supporting a public health plan and pay or play. As the Post says: The aim of the lobbying blitz is simple: to minimize the damage to insurers, hospitals and other major sectors while maximizing the potential of up to 46 million uninsured Americans as new customers. Although many firms have vowed to help cut costs, major players such as PhRMA [Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America], America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and others remain opposed to the public-insurance option. At a news conference last week, President Obama said many of the groups that oppose comprehensive health care reform are deliberately sowing fear in the public. He said that while most people support fixing the nation’s broken health are system, “they’re also afraid of the unknown.” And we have a long history in America of scaring people that they’re going to lose their doctor, they’re going to lose their health care plans, they’re going to be stuck with some bureaucratic government system that’s not responsive to their needs. And overcoming that fear—fear that is often actively promoted by special interests who profit from the existing system—is a challenge….My biggest job is to explain to the American people why this is so important and give them confidence that we can do better than we’re doing right now. House leaders hope to have the bill on the floor by the last week of July and a final vote before adjourning July 31 for the August recess. Congress reconvenes Sept. 8. Henry Waxman, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, said, “We cannot go home for a recess unless the House and the Senate” act on health care. In the Senate, the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee continues to work on its version of health care reform that also includes a public health insurance option and a pay or play provision. Last week, committee Democrats defeated an attempt by Republicans to kill the public plan option. Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) said a public plan would foster competition in the health insurance industry, promote efficiency in the market, along with innovation and fair competition, and guarantee a wellness and prevention dimension that would save money. The Finance Committee still is developing its version of health care reform legislation.
When asked yesterday about the urgency of reforming our nation's health care system Senator Lamar Alexander said "there is no rush." !
Last week, Senator Bob Corker agreed we need to reform our broken health care system, but said getting it done this year will be a "heavy lift."
Join other Tennesseans this Wednesday outside the offices of our Senators in Nashville and Jackson for a "lunch break" rally to make sure they know that now is the time to reform health care!Give your lunch break to reform! Attend one of Wednesday's "Prescription for Change Rallies."Nashville Rally - 3322 W End Ave, Nashville Tell us you are coming: http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102638786806&s=14618&e=001JG80Q2MhlOL7iA0T75914dk49XNkZXDL5_X11T8y5nxKvs6_kT9F1e0D_NCEMQvIsSy2qQypgCeD3jrRgXDuO3p6dg8_pgZisTe8v06UoqvVS0cduGGKPQ==
- or call 615-244-9791 Jackson Rally - 109 South Highland Avenue, JacksonTell us you are coming: http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102638786806&s=14618&e=001JG80Q2MhlOJeldoGz76BmcE8_5hkbUGcIxebX9dRj0cYsVc0sgmCDVNwewIMmdgxgMUth7nRiAIMi7HNTF1j7S5qDw4_XRtQVOu6uDiOaOwtD4sjze3jzSm2-SVRFYqy -
or call 731-664-5107 In Tennessee, health care is in crisis. Our families have seen insurance premiums go up over five times faster than our wages. Our small businesses pay about 18% more in premiums than big corporations and make up more than half of all uninsured. Our Seniors are forced to spend around 30% of their income on on out-of-pocket health care costs. All this, but our Senators think we can put off health care reform for yet another year. Our Senators need to hear from Tennesseans like you that reforming health care this year will end soaring out-of-pocket medical expenses and help jump start our economy.Together we can bring affordable, accessible coverage to Tennessee, but only if our elected officials in DC hear our voices. Join us!

