Underdog

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Republican`s Obstructionist ~ Absolutely !

Six Republican Governors Rather Play Politics than Aid Jobless Workers
by James Parks, Mar 30, 2009


With U.S. unemployment at the highest level in more than a quarter century, six Republican governors would rather play politics with the lives of their citizens than help them make ends meet. President Obama’s economic recovery plan provides $25 more per week and extends benefits for those who are jobless and struggling to feed their families. But as Karen Nussbaum, director of Working America, the AFL-CIO community affiliate, writes on Huffington Post: If you live in Alabama, Alaska, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina or Texas, you are laid off and left out.When AIG defrauded investors and the government, employees there took home millions in bonuses. Elsewhere, people are living unemployment check to unemployment check through no fault of their own, laid off because everyone is tightening their belts and job growth is nonexistent. Shoring up the unemployment insurance safety net is fundamental fairness. Rumored Republican presidential candidates Sarah Palin of Alaska and Bobby Jindal of Louisiana both refused the unemployment funds—maybe a harbinger of the type of president they would make? Millions of Americans need unemployment benefits to live. Nussbaum writes about several, including Marvin Bohn of Ohio, who was laid off after 42 years in the food service industry when Antioch College shut its doors last year. He has diabetes and heart disease, a pacemaker and a defibrillator, and needs 11 medications, but he couldn’t afford to continue his health coverage on the $329 a week he gets from unemployment insurance. He has run through his savings, paying his medical bills out of pocket, and he has not yet found another job. On Friday, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the new monthly unemployment figures and the numbers are expected to be even worse than the February’s 8.1 percent unemployment rate. As Nussbaum writes:
Meanwhile, the much looked-for help the federal government has offered will be available only to those Americans whose governors aren’t trying to score political points. It’s time to remember it isn’t just big corporations that are hurting in this economy. Let’s let these Republican governors know they need to help make America work for working Americans. Read Nussbaum’s entire article
here.



Editorial : It is time to face facts, Republicans represent those Americans who are most wealthy ! Wake up, Southern States ! Let us not forget Alaska !

Monday, March 30, 2009

Religious Groups Back Employee Free Choice Act

More Religious Groups Back Employee Free Choice ACT
by James Parks, Mar 30, 2009

Many religious leaders throughout the country have directly experienced working with women and men struggling for a voice on the job, fair wages and benefits, and security for their families. The Employee Free Choice Act will allow workers real freedom to form and join unions without fear or intimidation—a big reason why the list of religious supporters for the bill keeps growing.The latest to sign on in support of the Employee Free Choice Act include a wide diversity of religious beliefs. The range of faiths represented illustrates the widespread support for the bill, which is backed by 73 percent of Americans. For example, the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA, which represents more than 100,000 local congregations and 45 million persons in the United States, has endorsed the bill. Sojourners/Call to Renewal, the national faith-based movement for social justice and an end to poverty, has come out in support of Employee Free Choice. Both the Muslim American Society Freedom (MAS Freedom) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council also have joined the fight to allow workers to decide for themselves how to choose a union. The Jewish Labor Committee (JLC) also is behind the bill, saying in its statement of support that “for workers who decide to unionize, the current law is stacked against them.” Click here to sign JLC’s petition supporting the bill.
\
Other groups to recently announce support for the bill are:

Center of Concern;
Irish Apostolate USA;
Lutheran Volunteer Corps;
Unitarian Universalist Service Committee; and
Nebraskans for Peace.
Click
here or the title for a complete list of who’s backing the Employee Free Choice Act.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Free Democratic Trade Unions ~ Yes ! Essential to Democracy !



Free Democratic Trade Unions...
By : Anonymous

12.4% of the work force in America is union and all I hear is that unions are the cause of the United States of America’s companies for going broke or moving to Mexico NAFTA or other off shore countries. Let’s see if all or not all public workers are union Teachers, police, fire, and other types of Government jobs are Union, what does that leave about 11% 12% that are other trade union workers such as lazy ass plumbers, electricians, roofers, pilots, engineers aviation, and even some lazy ass farm worker unions. Yet the whole world is crashing and most of the workers of world are non-union.You always claim its lazy ass auto workers and tire workers that destroyed the US of A’s economy.You’re telling me that if everyone was not union and had lower pay they would have saved the USA from all these terrible problems caused by Banks and other financial institutions and upper Management corporations and their Greed. Oh! By the way Banks and other financial institutions and upper Management CEO aren’t they non-union, and they are the main cause of this financial meltdown in America that destroyed everyone’s 401k most likely yours too, not the auto workers not the unions.My question is why, is it ok for a company to make as much profit for CEO’S and others, yet it is wrong for workers to make as much profit as possible too? So if banding together to get what we can is bad because it hurts companies, then the banding of the colonies hurt the companies of England and the King (CEO). This must be a bad and terrible thing using your logic. I guess only evil men band together whether it be for creating a country, company, or union. Those men must have been out for personal gain or profit evil greedy men.Is it bad if a person tries to get profit or gain through the stocks?Is it bad if persons (workers) band together to get profit or gain?Everyone knows trickle down does not work, why because each person does not want to give or pass down any profit or gain they receive, to those that may be below them even if you make very little income.Whenever Goodyear came to the workers and asked, we need this or that done because it will save the company and workers jobs. The union always tried to do the right thing most of the time, at what point did Goodyear ever say good job to the workers anywhere and here is profit for you, were going to trickling it down. Never without a fight did this happen and don’t tell me the union sets wages they only set a temporary bottom that wages can go. Goodyear or any company could pay more to its employee’s but for some reason the rule is always pay them sub-minimum wages why is that?Money it seems to me is used to have power over others. The last depression caused more unionizing of labor ( that's history). The banding of all workers is again starting to take hold. The greed of Wall Street has once again set this in motion, so I thank all of you in the high world of finance you soon may have nothing. Too much greed killed your golden goose.

"Thanks Buddy" ! ~ for this one, I wish, I knew who wrote this ? They were reading my mind !

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Health Care Now !


Hello Everybody, 3/24/09

What do you think of our current health care system? I know you probably agree with me that it’s just plain broken - it costs too much, does too little, and in many cases hurts more than it helps. And the truth is, if we don’t change things soon, it’s only going to get worse. But this year we have a unique chance for health reform. But we need Congress to act. Click below to join me in demanding health action now! www.healthactionnow.org We know there are some in Congress who believe our current economic crisis means we can’t afford to fix health care right now. But with the cost of care skyrocketing and families’ health premiums slated to double in the next 10 years, we have one message to these naysayers: we can’t afford not to. The truth is, if we don’t fix health care, we can't truly fix our economy.Will you join me to make sure Congress and President Obama follow through on their promises to work together to pass comprehensive health reform this year? Send a message to Congress telling them you won't settle for anything less than health action NOW. www.healthactionnow.org
Thank you for helping me fight to make health care affordable for all Americans ! Click on the title or the links !

Your Friend, Underdog = Don Jones

Republicans Vs. The Working Class !


Proposal to Gut Employee Free Choice Act: Written by CEOs, for CEOs
by Seth Michaels, Mar 23, 2009

A group of three big corporations—Starbucks, Whole Foods and Costco—have floated a proposal for labor law reform that just won’t cut it. These big corporations are casting this proposal as a “compromise,” but it’s not. It’s not good for workers, it’s good for CEOs, and it fails to address the problems that are keeping workers from being able to form unions. The new proposal would enable corporations to unilaterally reject the will of a majority of employees who are seeking to form a union—as they do now. Unlike the Employee Free Choice Act, this proposal wouldn’t put the choice about how to form a union in the hands of workers, and it wouldn’t guarantee that workers who form a union can get a fair first contract. It would also make it easier for corporations to initiate drives to get rid of a union, which should be up to workers, not management. Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), two sponsors of the Employee Free Choice Act, say that the new corporate proposal would ultimately keep the broken, management-dominated status quo in place. It isn’t the change America’s workers and our economy need, say Miller and Harkin: This proposal is unacceptable. It was written by CEOs for CEOs. It is not a serious attempt at labor law reform because it fails to fundamentally address key problems that currently prevent workers from being able to join together and bargain for a better life. AFL-CIO Legislative Director Bill Samuel says the new proposal misses the point because it fails to include provisions to recognize a union if the majority of workers sign cards indicating their support for one. The Employee Free Choice Act is about protecting the fundamental freedom of workers to bargain with their employers for a better life and to join a union without corporate interference and harassment. The proposal being circulated by these companies falls short of meeting these standards. We are open to discussing the legislation with parties who are legitimately concerned with protecting workers. However, a proposal coming from corporations, some of whom have their own history of violating workers’ rights, is simply not an alternative that lives up to giving workers back the freedom to form unions.
(As David Groves of the Washington State Labor Council reports, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz is no model employer—he’s a “poster boy” for why we need the Employee Free Choice Act.) Miller and Harkin say that the proposal suggested by Starbucks, Whole Foods and Costco is a distraction—a way to deter real change, rather than an honest effort at fixing the system for forming unions. It is nothing more than a classic Washington lobbying campaign intended to confuse the issues and disguise the real agenda of maintaining the status quo. Despite largely leaving corporate power intact, this proposal is likely to be a non-starter among the Big Business lobbies who are carrying out the anti-Employee Free Choice disinformation campaign. Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, called it a “no-compromise” bill in an address to business leaders in Denver last week—signaling division among corporate honchos about how to respond to the Employee Free Choice Act. Religious denominations, civil rights groups, community organizations, hundreds of members of Congress and allies of workers around the country understand addressing the challenges facing our economy means ensuring workers have a voice on the job. And that means passing the Employee Free Choice Act.

Editorial : Senator Arlen Spector defected today, he will not vote to pass the EFCA ! I do not believe there is one Republican Senator who will vote for this bill ! The Republicans are now public enemy number#1 to the working class, but, they always have been ! A working man or woman voting republican is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders ! Wake up America/Tennesseans.

Monday, March 23, 2009

InSurance Company`s Running Our Health Care System...Bad Idea !



Voice of Growl, Albert worries glitch will keep him from getting new heart
The insurance plan may require him to wait months before a transplant evaluation can start.

Aaron E. Daye/Staff photographer


Karl Kaufmann, center, a former longtime voice of Albert the Alligator, sits with his wife Suzanne, right, in their southwest Gainesville home on Thursday.
By Anthony Clark Staff writer
Saturday, March 21, 2009
The man behind the voice of Gator Growl and Albert the Alligator for nearly 30 years needs a new heart, but a glitch in his wife's insurance policy has the couple wondering whether he will be able to get one in time. Karl Kaufmann, 53, suffered a near fatal heart attack on April 10, 2008. During a three-week hospitalization, the hotel sales consultant and former Gator cheerleader was put on life support and went into cardiogenic shock in which swelling and fluid buildup slowed his blood flow and nearly shut down his organs. He said he was given a 1 percent to 3 percent chance of survival before he was stabilized and eventually released. His wife, Suzanne Clark-Kaufmann, called a priest to be ready. "Later, (my doctor) looked at me and said, 'You weren't expected to make it and you did,' " Karl said. Since that time, Suzanne, a pharmacist, changed jobs from working at a Winn-Dixie pharmacy to a Wal-Mart pharmacy. Before she did, however, she got assurances from her district manager that Karl would immediately be covered under her employee insurance plan, fully aware that he would one day need a new heart. They were covered by Blue Cross plans through both companies. All of Karl's care was covered, until his doctor decided last week after a couple of tests that he needed to start evaluating Karl for a transplant sooner rather than later. The doctor told Karl his heart may last two weeks or a year, but when it declines it will decline quickly and he should do the transplant as soon as he can. Now they have to wait until September just to have an evaluation. As soon as Shands HealthCare confirmed that their insurance was through Wal-Mart, the couple said the hospital put the brakes on the evaluation. The one part of their coverage they had overlooked is that Wal-Mart requires a one-year wait from the time the benefits kick in before the transplant evaluation can begin. That will not be for another six months. They said they were told they could apply for an individual exemption, but were told by Shands that Wal-Mart usually won't budge. Karl said Wal-Mart's reply to their request was "this is our policy." "Obviously, we have a policy that's in place and when the associate or her family member is eligible, then they'll be referred to the clinic for an assessment," spokesman Greg Rossiter told The Sun. "In the meantime, we'll be glad to answer their questions to help them prepare." Suzanne said her concern is how long the entire transplant process takes. If Karl is eligible for a heart, he then has to go on a waiting list. And he needs the new heart before his health declines too much. "They need to start on it because they said he's going to crash. It could be two days, two weeks, two months, but definitely within the year," Suzanne said. Suzanne said she blames herself for not getting the transplant policy in writing before she changed jobs. She said she is desperate. Now she is hoping someone at Wal-Mart will hear their plea and make an exception. "I just wanted people to know because somebody's got to be able to do something," she said through tears. "If someone's life is on the line and six months could make a difference and the company's supposedly based on family values, it just doesn't make sense to me." ?
Karl admits it will be a moot point if the pressure in his lungs doesn't go down from the medicine he is currently getting from a portable IV. His concern is seeing his daughters, ages 9 and 13, grow up. "I've got two little girls, and I'm bound and determined to walk them down the aisle," he said.
Editorial : With the insurance company`s and Wal-Mart running things, The average joe, does not stand a chance, and some say there isn`t anything wrong with our health care system, Try Telling that to Karl and Suzanne !

Employee Free Choice Act...Levels the Playing Field !


Wall Street Journal: Employee Free Choice Does NOT Eliminate Secret Ballots
by Seth Michaels, Mar 20, 2009



A striking concession today from the hard-right, corporate-friendly editorial board of the Wall Street Journal: In the midst of an angry editorial against the Employee Free Choice Act, the authors undermine years of messaging by anti-worker corporate groups by acknowledging: The bill doesn’t remove the secret ballot option from the National Labor Relations Act….However, the Journal writes erroneously that the bill makes secret ballots a “dead letter.” But as we’ve pointed out many times, the Employee Free Choice Act puts the choice of majority sign-up or a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) election in the hands of the workers who want to form a union, rather than leaving workers at the mercy of management in that decision.This acknowledgment is a big turnaround from the Journal’s frequent practice—detailed here by Think Progress—of making the “eliminate secret ballots” claim. So there you have it: the Wall Street Journal editorial board says that the Employee Free Choice Act won’t eliminate secret ballots. Those who continue to try and contend that it does are trying to mislead the public and contradicting what the bill’s opponents know is true. Not that secret ballots are sacrosanct for opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act when it serves their own interests. In fact, the Republican Party bylaws forbid secret ballot votes on most matters before the party’s national committee, notes Greg Sargent of The Plum Line blog. The Journal’s ed board demonstrates that opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act are not against it because of their deep sense of respect for workers’ rights or for fairness. They oppose it because it would level the playing field and end corporate dominance over the process by which workers form unions. It would give workers the bargaining power they need to get a fair share of the value they create and would take the decision about how to form unions out of bosses’ hands and give it to workers. Despite the Journal editorial board’s opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act, apparently the staff decided it can’t keep up the act anymore. Today we herald the beginning of the end for the myth of “eliminating the secret ballot.”
Editorial : At times there are those among us, who read and see what they want too ! Republicans, Chamber of Commerce just to name two !


Saturday, March 21, 2009

The Great Bear Hunt ! Or "Rip & The Bear"!













"Rip & The Bear" !
By : "Dad" Don Jones

I rarely write about my family. Having said that, I`m going to write about my youngest son affectionately called "Rip" ! Rip is the last of the good guys, a real treasure. I say that with all sincerity and much love. His word is is his bond. He says what he does, and does what he says. In today`s world that is almost unheard of. I do not say these things in idle time phrase`s. I do not say them, because he is my son. I say it because it is true. Having said these praise`s, I now move on to the real reason for today's blog. Rip is a great wild game hunter. at one time, when I was younger, he and I would travel to South Dakota to pheasant hunt, we had a great time ! Every year in early autumn, Rip travels to Colorado to hunt large game. Elk, mule dear and bear ! He has been very successful in his hunts thus far. One year he killed a huge, almost royal elk. He has traveled to a island in the pacific to hunt rare large game and killed a large mule dear. Then one year he got the "Bear Fever" he wanted to bag a bear. he bought his bear tag for a couple of years, but alas no bear ! So, one summer he went to Colorado and stayed a month and tracked bear, to learn their habitats and habits. He took still cameras and placed them in strategic areas where he would find bear signs. He really got some great pictures. He was learning the way of the bear and he did. Then this past season in Colorado, he went hunting again, without going into great detail, which he would be glad to do for you, I will just tell you he killed a monster bear ! This bear weighed in at 551 lbs. 7 ft. 1 inch. from nose to tail ! A huge Brown Bear specimen. He is having this bear mounted in a full life-size mount.To say that my son was elated would be an understatement. He called me from atop of one of those mountains to tell me. He thought this bear would go in the Boone/Crockett book of world records. It did not. His friend Mark, lives in Henry County, today an official from the (Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency) was coming to Paris Tennessee to a place called Hulmes Sporting goods, for the specific purpose of logging in official weights and measures of wild game, Mark picked up the skull and jaw bone of this bear and took it to Hulmes to be measured officially. I`m sad to report that this bear was 3/16 of an inch short of the record book. Rip, was disappointed, but not as badly as you might think, He had missed going into the record book by 3/16 of an inch. There will be other seasons and other game. He loves the hunt and the outdoors so much. He is a hunter and conservationist. As I said earlier, he is a rare and extraordinary man !
The pictures at top are (1.)Rip and the Bear (2.)Pete, Russell,"The Bear" Rip and Mark, his friend`s (3.) Cary, The Bear & Rip, Cary is referred too, as his second Dad !

Friday, March 20, 2009

Health-Care is Vital !

U.S. House Moves Forward on Health Care Reform...

Three committee chairmen in the U.S. House have agreed to work together to pass similar health care reform legislation in their committees before the recess in August. According to CQ Today, Charlie Rangel (D-NY), Chair of the Committee on Ways and Means, Henry Waxman (D-CA) Chair of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and George Miller, (D-CA) Chair of the Committee on Education and Labor, made the agreement. These committees have overlapping jurisdiction over health care, and the chairmen hope that their coordinated efforts to pass similar legislation will ensure success with reform efforts. The Senate probably will not be able to move as quickly as the House. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will have to schedule more time for debate in his chamber than Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) will in the House. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) said last week that he wants his committee to vote on an overhaul in June. A health overhaul in the Senate will have to be approved by Baucus’ panel and by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, chaired by Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA). Sen. Kennedy is recuperating from brain cancer treatment in Florida and has not announced a timetable for his committee to vote on a bill. “Health care reform should come as soon as possible, and it should provide early retirees the option to purchase Medicare coverage. Many of the 5.1 million Americans between 55-64 who lack health insurance are victims of mass layoffs,” !

Taxation of Employer-Provided Health Benefits is on the Table

The New York Times reported on Saturday that the Obama administration and Senator Baucus have indicated that they are open to the idea of taxing employee health benefits to offset the costs of health care reform. Eliminating “employer exclusion” would represent a tax increase for working families and retirees with employer provided insurance, and many policy analysts believe that this proposal would hurt efforts to expand access to quality, affordable health care for all Americans. The proposal would also undermine health care coverage by causing employers to discontinue the higher cost employee and retiree health care plans, disrupting health insurance for those who have coverage they like. I oppose taxing employee health benefits because it would give employers an incentive to walk away,” “Americans bargained for these benefits, and have every right to expect to move forward and not backward.”

Monday, March 09, 2009

Health Insurance CEO`S Are Doing Alright ! Ya Think ?

Health Insurance CEOs Pocket Average $14.2 Million$
by Mike Hall, Mar 9, 2009

Earlier this week, we brought you the disturbing news that more than one-third of all Americans went without health insurance for long periods of time during the past two years—mostly because they couldn’t afford the high cost. Today’s heath insurance news goes way beyond disturbing. It will make you downright angry. In 2007, the CEOs at the top seven for-profit, private insurance companies pocketed an average of $14.2 million in total compensation. Or as our friends at Insurance Company Rules calculated, the equivalent of the average annual cost ($12,680) of health insurance for 1,127 families of four. Click here for a chart showing the pay of the top seven CEOs. (Insurance Company Rules is a project of Health Care for America Now, HCAN, that helps bust the myths about health care reform peddled by the insurance industry.) There is a growing tsunami of support for comprehensive health care reform that includes a public plan as an option for workers and families who either have private insurance coverage or no coverage at all: In other words, competition for the big profit-making private insurers. A public plan option was a big topic at yesterday’s White House Summit on Health Care. Not surprisingly, the insurance companies, led by the industry group America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and far right-wingers, have teamed up to try to kill such a plan and convince the public it would drive up costs, limit coverage and leave millions uninsured.Why the huge attack against competition? Insurance Company Rules explains: What they offer is a bad deal for customers and the general public. As the United States Government Accountability Office reported recently, people who have signed up with private Medicare plans (private insurance companies that contract with the government to provide benefits to people with Medicare), can end up having to pay more out-of-pocket than they would under the public Medicare plan (traditional fee-for-service). But are the plans saving taxpayers money? No! The private fee-for-service plans are actually costing the public 17 percent more than when the government handles the coverage itself. If consumers discover they can get the same or better coverage at a lower cost, those $14 million paychecks may start shrinking and, who knows, maybe the corporate jets would be grounded. Click here to check out Insurance Company Rules. The AFL-CIO has not endorsed a specific health care reform plan but has established certain principles around which any plan should be built (click here for more details).

Editorial : WHY are these CEO`S making that much money ? "Greed, Ya Think"!

Sunday, March 08, 2009

The Masonic Ring by Howie Damron

More Light on Freemasonry...Yes I am a Freemason !

Saturday, March 07, 2009

Union Matters...We Do Not Learn from our Past Mistakes



The New York Times Magazine
June 26, 1938
BEHIND THE CONFLICT IN “BLOODY HARLAN”

The Background of Mountains and Hill Folk Against Which a Dramatic Trial is Being Held
By: F. Raymond Daniell

Technically and legally the coal operators, corporations and peace officers of Harlan County on trial here at London are charged with a criminal conspiracy to nullify the Wagner Act. Actually, however, it is the political and economic system of that rich soft-coal field which is at the bar. For in Harlan County, as nowhere else in the county, except possibly on the cotton plantations of the Deep South, the visitor encounters feudalism and paternalism which survive despite all efforts to break them down. For years the county has been known as “bloody Harlan.” It is feud country, and last year there were sixty murders within its precincts. But Harlan has no monopoly on violence and bloodshed; its designation is due rather to the fact that much of the bloodshed has been directly connected with the struggle between miners and operators and with union organizations. Because of the national interest in that warfare its troubles have received more attention than other outbursts in the feud belt. Within Harlan County, which lies in the southeastern corner of Kentucky on the Virginia border, are some 70,000 inhabitants. From 16,000 to 18,000 men work in the mines and produce from 14,000,000 to 18,000,000 tons of coal, worth $45,000,000 each year. This is more than a third of Kentucky’s total bituminous production and, while only a drop in the national total, it is of sufficiently high quality and is produced so cheaply under existing labor conditions that it is a strong competitor with the product of other fields. It is that fact, more than the hope of swelling its treasury with several thousand new members, each paying dues of $1.50 a month, which is responsible for the determined effort now being made by the United Mine Workers to organize the Harlan miners. Unless this effort succeeds, the union fears it will lose its recognition in neighboring coal fields, where operators are complaining that they cannot maintain union standards unless Harlan County’s operators are brought into line. Prior to 1911 Harlan County was a quiet rural community of small mountain farms. The chief industry was agriculture and logging, with a little moon shining. Even then it was known that beneath the ridges lying between Pine and Black Mountains, along the forks of the Cumberland River, there was wealth in the form of soft coal such as was needed for the manufacture of steel. There was no way, however, of getting it out to the Great Lakes. Then the railroad came. Overnight the characteristics of the countryside changed. Here and there the beautiful green hills were defaced by the winding conveyors over which the minded coal is carried from the drift mouth or mine opening in the hillside to the tipple, where it is broken and sorted and sized alongside the railroad tracks. Great piles of black waste and excavated earth began making their appearance on the hillsides, and from neighboring counties there came a swarm of farm boys and men, lured by the hope of high pay. There were no towns, no houses for the miners, except those the coal operators built, and thus there came into being the company town and the company store. As the coal industry grew in Harlan County, local capitalists got in on the ground floor. Among them was R. W. Creech, a patriarchal old gentleman with mustaches which spread a full eight inches on either side of his nose. He had been a lumberman before the railroad came, floating his logs down the river. To him his employees are like children, to be cared for and kept in order. He is one of the defendants in the conspiracy trial. Others among the defendants flocked into Harlan County in the early days of the industry. Among them were many who went there to escape labor troubles in other fields. They brought with them a bitterness against Unions that has never died.The camps they built for their laborers had moral standards on a par with the standards of the environment. Red liquor was drunk in Homeric quantities and fights were common. The county disclaimed responsibility for policing the mine camps, and there grew up the practice of hiring a special policeman and having him deputized by the Sheriff to lend the authority of law to his six-shooter. Even now the mining camps of Harlan County are no week-end resorts for sissies. The industry of the peace officers in rounding up drunks on Saturday night is prodigious. The fine, usually amounting to $19.50, is often paid by the company employing the prisoner and then deducted from his pay. In the four years ended last Jan. 1, the records show that 14,000 persons went to the lock-up at one time or another-a profitable guadrennium for the jailer, who is allowed 75 cents a day for feeding each prisoner. A good manager can do it for considerably less.
For years the operators had everything their own way. But Harlan’s position in the coal business and the number of unorganized miners there were not over-looked by the Unions. There were repeated efforts to Unionize the district, and for years the Unionized miners and the operators have been engaged in a bitter feud, with not all the violence directed at the miners. Back in 1931, when the United Mine Workers made an abortive effort to organize the Harlan field, there was competition for members among several rival unions, including one said to have been dominated by Communists and members of the I.W.W. In this period there was an epidemic of burglary of company stores and thefts of dynamite and copper from the companies, which was blamed on union members and organizers. The company put Sheriff’s deputies on their payrolls, and the killing of such deputies in a battle with strikers led to the “reign of terror” which union men say has been set up against them. With the passage of the NRA, the Guffey Act and, finally, the Wagner Act, outsiders came in to organize the miners, and agents of the Federal Government stepped in. The world of the Harlan County coal barons began to topple. The United Mine Workers have succeeded in negotiating contracts with ten of the forty-two mines operating in Harlan County, and today the union has a office in the town of Harlan, and its field workers travel about without molestation as long as they stay off non-union company property. Although only about a fourth of the county’s population works in the mines, nearly everybody in the county is dependent, directly or indirectly, on them.
Only about 12,000 live in free, incorporated towns, and even there the influence of the coal operators is strong. The other 58,000 live in company towns, occupy company houses, walk on company streets, shop in company stores, go to company churches and send their children to company schools. Illness is treated by company doctors and justice is often administered by company magistrates, who hold court on company property. One of the big companies, until recently, had its own private jail. The company towns range in size from little settlements of 100 or 200 houses, to cities like Lynch, owned by a subsidiary of United States Steel, where more than 9,000 miners and their families live under rules and conditions laid down by a board of directors instead of a Common Council. Here the streets are surfaced, the houses painted, and, though plumbing is almost rare as elsewhere in the county, living conditions appear reasonably good. There is a private police force and a private fire department, a smart-looking new motion-picture theatre and a department store which might be a branch of a New York or Chicago store. Lynch, where a higher proportion of workers of alien stock are employed than elsewhere, has the only Roman Catholic Church in the county. In contrast to this tree-shaded little city, with its neat lawns and flower gardens, are the more typical towns of the smaller, locally owned companies. There the muddy, rutted streets swarm with pigs, raised to supplement the family larder when the cold weather comes. The dilapidated houses, standing in pools of stagnant water, and the vacant faces of the inhabitants present a depressing picture to the visitor from outside. Yet shiny new automobiles, in improvised garages underneath the houses, washing machines on the back porch and electric refrigerators in the living room are as common as in the camps where housing conditions are better. In the middle of the county is the town of Harlan, a rather shabby county seat of wood and brick buildings, hemmed in, almost squeezed, by the surrounding mountains. It is one of the three incorporated towns in the county, the others being Cumberland and Evarts. Harlan’s Chamber of Commerce claims for the town a population of about 7,000, and Harlan is the shopping center for all the people in the county who have managed to scrape together enough cash to trade away from the company store. Even here, however, mine operators or their kinsfolk control most of the mercantile establishments in the town. A man can’t even buy a headache remedy without patronizing the operators, for they own the drug stores, too. Many of the county’s people are mountain folk, quick to anger and quick to shoot. Men think no more of toting a gun than Englishmen do of carrying an umbrella. For a time, until the quaint inconsistency was corrected a few years ago, the Kentucky statutes provided a stiffer penalty for the man who merely fired at someone than for the man who wounded his enemy. Outside a little church in Harlan on Sunday night the writer saw two boys, not more than 12 or 13, with businesslike .38-caliber revolvers in their overall pockets.The people tend to resent intrusion in their affairs by “furriners,” much as they would resent a stranger “messin’ around” their women folk. During an inspection tour of the mines the writer ordered a photographer to take a picture of a “Tobacco Road” family – a mother sitting beside her cabin with a nursing baby and an old miner resting on the back stoop and was about to ask the woman’s permission when the local photographer intervened. “Ask the man, not the woman,” he said. “He might shoot if you ask her.” And then on our tour of the company towns our driver stopped suddenly in the road at High Splint and began backing up. At first the reason was not apparent. Then a boulder, the size of a cabbage, rolled down the road in front of the car. Four boys stopped playing ball and retreated to the sidelines. From between two houses there came a man, his shirt torn and bloody, wielding an axe handle. Retreating before him was a man with a rock which must have weighed ten pounds. He threw it and the man with the axe handle had at him. When it was over the stone-thrower was unconscious in the road and the club-wielder was leaning against a fence, blood pouring from a crack in his skull. No one interfered or seemed especially interested.The feud tradition is a strong factor in Harlan’s way of life. For generations it has been the custom, when a man is killed by a member of a rival clan, for all the victim’s family to go gunning for the killer and his kinsfolk. Honor is not considered avenged until the mortality score is even. Interference by the law and the courts is bitterly resented.
Relations between miners and operators have a similar directness. In the company towns, the homes of the operators generally are alongside the three and four room dwellings of the miners, who pay between $1.50 and $2.50 a month per room. It still is a common thing for the children of the operator to go to the same company school as the children of the common laborers until they have reached high-school age. As a matter of fact, it is said with some justification that mine children in company towns get more schooling than the children of incorporated towns. The county provides only seven months’ salary for the teacher, but the company town usually pays the teacher for keeping school open another two months. The schools are built by the company, but the teacher is appointed by the Superintendent of Schools.The owners of the mines dress in khaki work clothes, go in and out of the mines and sit in an office, usually on the ground floor of the commissary, unguarded by secretaries. Any worker is free to come in with his problems whether they be financial, domestic, or legal, and he usually can count on receiving help if he has kept clear of the United Mine Workers.The mines pay off every two weeks in cash, and when times are good the miners of Harlan County make relatively good money, receiving from the open-shop mines a little above the union scale, but working longer hours than union men and having no means of checking company figures on the amount of coal they dig. Most of the financial transactions between the miner and the store are carried out by means of scrip issued to the employees against credit they have established by their labor under-ground. This scrip is non-transferable, and, generally speaking, can be spent only in the company store, where prices are slightly higher than in the cash chain stores downtown. Everything from the finest quality meats and canned goods to the latest in overstuffed furniture can be bought there. Many of the commissaries sell liquor, which is legal in Harlan County. Credit is available in almost unlimited amounts to regular employees of the mines, whether the mines are running or not. When they do run, the operator knows his men will dig coal and he will sell it, deducting the amount he has advanced from the pay due the miners. Most of the company stores now have about an average of $20,000 outstanding in over-drafts of miners, but they are not worried. In one camp this correspondent was permitted to inspect the ledger in which the miners’ accounts are kept. One entry showed that one of the miners, after all the credit advanced to him had been deducted from his earnings for a month, came out exactly even with the company. Closer inspection showed that he was paying a lower rate of rent than the other miners. When the treasurer of the company was asked about this, he explained that the amount this man had earned last month was a little less than the credit that had been advance him so the company cut his rent by a few cents to make it come out even. In Harlan a miner who “keeps shet” of union activities need not worry about keeping a roof over his head, nor need he concern himself much with where the next meal-or, for that matter, the next drink-is coming from, for the paternalistic employer provides a kind of social security. Harlan’s leading citizens are anxious that this side of the picture be presented. Such are the setting and the background for the drama in the court room here in London which the whole county has been watching. Harlan today sees what may be the climax in the struggle between two sharply differing ways and philosophies of life.
Talk to the operators of the mines and you will hear that they want to protect their miners from being forced to join a union which they do not want and which, they say, for all the dues collected, cannot give them anything they do not now receive without the necessity of paying dues. You will also understand that the operators want to run their mines without outside interference.
Talk to the union leaders and you will hear that they are fighting paternalism of the operators. They charge that the one thing a miner may not do on company property is think for himself or speak out in public. They are fighting, they will tell you, to free the miners from an archaic system in which liberty has no place.

Editorial : Today, things have changed a little. But, not as much they should, we are still fighting the same old archaic system of those who do not wish for the workers to have a voice in their work place. Today we are trying to get the "Employee`s Free Choice Act" passed, and the Republican Senate are doing all they can to disrupt and defeat this basic right bill. As the title of this blog says, it seems we do not learn from our past mistakes ! With freedom to Join free democratic trade unions, perhaps Harlan and the United Mine Workers of the past can lead the way. Remenber this was written in 1938, one year before I was born. Workers need the "Employee`s free Choice Act" Passed !

Friday, March 06, 2009

Unions Key To Economic Recovery !



Employee Free Choice Act Key to Rebuilding Middle Class
by
James Parks, Mar 5, 2009

Vice President Joe Biden met with the AFL-CIO Executive Council today in Miami, where he reiterated the administration’s support for the Employee Free Choice Act, saying, “If a union is what you want, a union you’re entitled to have.” Vice President Joe Biden told the AFL-CIO Executive Council today that returning our economy to health means restoring the basic right to join a union and bargain collectively. And the way to do that is by passing the Employee Free Choice Act. He quoted President Obama saying: ‘”I don’t buy the argument that providing workers with collective bargaining rights somehow weakens the economy or worsens the business environment.”If you’ve got workers who have a decent pay and benefits, they also are customers for your business. So let me add to that and say that I have a simple, basic belief, one that we’re going to work hard to put into action: If a union is what you want, a union you’re entitled to have. The vice president quoted AFL-CIO President John Sweeney’s recent remarks in his column expressing basic truths that should guide the AFL-CIO in 2009: We can’t fix the economy by hurting workers. Rescuing the economy will require investments in jobs, infrastructure, health care. When you’re in a deep hole, you need a long ladder. Rebuilding our broken economy gives us the opportunity to get it right and reward workers. Progressive, pro-family, pro-worker candidates won. So isn’t it time that we have progressive, pro-worker, pro-family priorities that win, too? Click here to read the entire Sweeney column. Biden, who heads the White House Task Force on the Middle Class, told the council the Obama administration is dedicated to rebuilding the nation’s middle class. You can’t have a strong middle class without a strong labor movement. We will judge the success or failure of our administration at the end of our four years, based on whether or not the standard of living of the middle class has increased or not. That’s the bottom-line measure. And guess what. Neither one of us believes it can get better without you getting stronger. The people Teddy Roosevelt used to call the “doers of deeds”—the people who teach our children, protect our neighborhoods, protect our homes. The people who staff our hospitals, who work on the line—on the lines that a few are working on these days. The people who are our nation’s heart and soul, and I would add, our nation’s spine. They are the spine of the nation. For too long, Biden said, we’ve failed to have a White House that puts families front and center in our economic policies. That’s why the Obama economic recovery program focuses on jobs, he said, and the administration is pushing for real health care reform. He also said the Obama-Biden team would never have won without the support of working families. Biden’s visit to the Executive Council follows a two-day visit from Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, who participated in a town hall forum on Sunday and met with the union leaders Monday.

Thursday, March 05, 2009

President Obama ~ Health Care

Making History...
By: Don Jones
I have today witnessed more history in regard to our wonderful country. President Obama held a meeting/conference on health care for all of our citizens in this country. He had those from the Senate...The Congress...Nurse`s...Dr.`s Labor Unions...Industry...private citizens...Insurance...small business...I`m sure I have missed some, but you get the idea, he is trying to get input from those who are and will be affected by Universal Health Care. I noticed right behind the President was Jimmy Hoffa, President of the Teamsters Union. Republicans and Democrats and Independents, all who would be involved in this massive undertaking. I also noticed Senator Mitch McConnell(R)Kentucky was there and asking questions, and that is OK, However, he will oppose this program. My point is that President Obama has done more in 35 days for all of our citizens, than "W" did in eight years. Try to remember that it took "W" eight years to get us in this terrible shape. In this writers opinion, President Obama is as close to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in his outlook, than any president in recent history. I only hope that he can fulfill all of his aspirations. At the risk of repeating myself, I`ll ask a question, who will pay for this program?
Ultimately it will be you and I, the tax-payer. but, thats true in everything our country buy`s or spends. The question is, how it will be decided who pays what and how much.

Monday, March 02, 2009

Unions Are not Hurting America !


Unions Don’t Hurt International Competitiveness...
by Seth Michaels, Feb 27, 2009

A new snapshot study from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) debunks the myth that unions have a negative effect on a nation’s ability to compete in a global economy. Check out the above graph, comparing current account deficit—a measure of international competitiveness—with rates of union membership in major industrialized nations. As we’ve noted, strong unions are compatible with a strong economy, and yet another measure shows it: many nations with higher levels of union membership than the United States, like Canada, Germany and Denmark, have very strong export sectors and a positive trade balance.
As EPI’s Josh Bivens notes, the relationship between competitiveness and union density doesn’t show that unions hurt a nation’s ability to compete:
Note that the United States has the lowest union coverage rate in the sample yet also has the biggest current account deficit. There is, in short, nothing about highly unionized economies that suggests they can’t be internationally competitive.This analysis proves the falsity of opponents who contend the increased union membership resulting from the
Employee Free Choice Act will harm the nation’s standing in the global economy. Find more EPI research on labor policy here.
Editorial : Buy/Purchase American, when and if you can ! "The Job you save my be your own" !

Sunday, March 01, 2009

Understanding Pulmonary Hypertension

I hope this gives you a better understanding of Pulmonary Hypertension ! Shortness of Breath, not much fun !